On Oct 18, 6:23 am, Harkness <caliba... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 17, 11:58 pm, Harkness <caliba... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 17, 8:26 pm, readache <cerebureaucr... DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > in no particular order
>
> > > john ford
> > > howard hawks
> > > sergio leone
> > > sam peckinpah
> > > anthony mann
> > > budd boetticher
> > > william wyler (if only for Big Country)
> > > george stevens (if only for Shane)
> > > raoul walsh
> > > walter hill
>
> > You expecting arguments?
>
> > I'd probably dump Stevens and Wyler on the grounds that each of them
> > made about one Western.. Maybe throw in Allan Dwan and Delmer Daves.
>
> Yikes. How did I forget Clint Eastwood? Unforgiven and Josey Wales
> over Big Country and Shane, that's for damned sure.
>
> John Harkness- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
clint eastwood was not, is not a great director of westerns. at best,
he was pretty good.
i think the only films with eastwood that approaches greatness are
Mystic River and Flags of Our Fathers/Letters to Iwo Jima. but even
those are great-ish than truly great. they are professional and wise
than original or truly masterful.
eastwood is certainly one of the great western stars. but a great
western director? come on!
high plains drifter is fun in the outrageous mode but it's no great
work of direction.
outlaw josey wales is, at best, solid.
pale rider isn't good at all.
unforgiven looks good and has a terrific performance by gene hackman.
rest of the movie is unconvicing, heavy, preachy, and overly
politicized. also, a western hero should not philosophize like
eastwood does. he's making sermons. also, the film's irony is
heavier than a dead horse.
>> Stay informed about: 10 greatest directors of westerns