On 6-Dec-2003, "Cadet Grey" <cadetgrey.RemoveThis@swbell.net> wrote:
> Well, Ms. Mornstendung, another typically ridiculous question. "One
> movie per natinality (sic)" cannot be used as a rule in naming the 10
> best films *ever*, since:
No more so than the other myriad of "best" lists.
> 1) there are more than 10 "natins" which have produced films; and
> 2) the best effort of any one "natin" isn't necessarily going to be
> superior to the second-best effort of this "natin".
As what happens every year for the Oscars.
> Now if you want to name 10 nations and poll the group as to what
> each individual believes the best film to come out of those countries
> might be, *that's* at least doable, albeit of dubious merit.
They're both doable. At least to the extent that the Oscars do it - and
they do.
>> Stay informed about: 10 best films ever(one movie per natinality)