Welcome to MovieandPop.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

16mm B/W negative Plu-X and Double-X

 
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Cinematography General RSS
Next:  12 Volt batteries.  
Author Message
Jaxon Bridge

External


Since: Aug 25, 2003
Posts: 39



(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:13 pm
Post subject: 16mm B/W negative Plu-X and Double-X
Archived from groups: alt>movies>cinematography (more info?)

Has anyone experience with these two stocks? I wonder how they look,
they are priced lower than reveral black/white, makes me wonder.
Being that they are negative, I would expect the exposure latitude to
be greater and the graininess to be lower. Is this the case??

jaxon

 >> Stay informed about: 16mm B/W negative Plu-X and Double-X 
Back to top
Login to vote
David Mullen

External


Since: Aug 22, 2003
Posts: 52



(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 6:54 am
Post subject: Re: 16mm B/W negative Plu-X and Double-X [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> Has anyone experience with these two stocks? I wonder how they look,
> they are priced lower than reveral black/white, makes me wonder.
> Being that they are negative, I would expect the exposure latitude to
> be greater and the graininess to be lower. Is this the case??

Graininess is higher because the contrast is lower -- the high contrast of
reversal stock tends to create the impression of less grain and greater
sharpness. There's nothing quite as sharp and fine-grained as Plus-X B&W
Reversal (of course, it's also slower than Plus-X B&W Negative, which
helps.)

David Mullen

 >> Stay informed about: 16mm B/W negative Plu-X and Double-X 
Back to top
Login to vote
Les Kanekuni

External


Since: Aug 01, 2003
Posts: 8



(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2003 4:11 pm
Post subject: Re: 16mm B/W negative Plu-X and Double-X [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"David Mullen" <davidm2.TakeThisOut@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<oSoVa.123826$Io.10580758@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
> > Has anyone experience with these two stocks? I wonder how they look,
> > they are priced lower than reveral black/white, makes me wonder.
> > Being that they are negative, I would expect the exposure latitude to
> > be greater and the graininess to be lower. Is this the case??
>
> Graininess is higher because the contrast is lower -- the high contrast of
> reversal stock tends to create the impression of less grain and greater
> sharpness. There's nothing quite as sharp and fine-grained as Plus-X B&W
> Reversal (of course, it's also slower than Plus-X B&W Negative, which
> helps.)
>
> David Mullen

Yeah, I love Plus-X Reversal. It's like velvet. Great for day
exteriors. Pretty slow (40/50 ASA). Can be pushed a stop without much
change in grain.
 >> Stay informed about: 16mm B/W negative Plu-X and Double-X 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Depth of field/T-stop for 35mm format lens on 16mm????? - Anyone know how to figure depth of field when using a lens designed for a 35mm film frame, when using such a lens with a 16mm frame? Seems to me an f 1.8 lens for a 35mm frame, would not be a 1.8 lens in terms of depth of field or T-stop. Thanks, ..
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Cinematography General All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]