CC on AFI Top 100

On Jun 24, 10:56 am, G-HE....RemoveThis@webtv.net (George Shelps) wrote:
> Richard Carnahan wrote:
> >Onw thing is clear. Your motives are
> >clearly evident to all those who read here.
>
> I don't believe you..

Then you must never read your own posts.
 >> Stay informed about: CC on AFI Top 100 

rfcsac627n.TakeThisOut@aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
wrote:

>>>Onw thing is clear. Your motives are
>>>clearly evident to all those who read here.

>>I don't believe you..

>Then you must never read your own
>posts.

You're a liar.
 >> Stay informed about: CC on AFI Top 100 

On Jun 21, 1:02 pm, David Totheroh <dtothe....RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote:
> On Jun 21, 12:42 pm, WaverBoy <waver....RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 21, 12:09 pm, "constance.kuriy...@ttu.edu"
>
> > <constance.kuriy....RemoveThis@ttu.edu> wrote:
> > > I was amused by Robin Williams' reference to "the dance of the
> > > potatoes." Strangely, some people do think the rolls are potatoes,
> > > though I'd think they'd be rather heavy for such delicate
> > > maneuvers.
>
> > > And someone else seemed to think that Chaplin did that bit at
> > > dinner parties *before* he filmed it. As far as I know there's no
> > > evidence of that.
>
> > > Connie K.
>
> > But Roscoe Arbuckle might have.
>
> Yes, and there were probably literally a few hundred film comedians
> before Chaplin. So what? None of them did it anywhere near as well.

Testy, aren't we?

I'm well aware that everybody borrowed from everybody. Just a bit of
humor, you old sod. :-)
 >> Stay informed about: CC on AFI Top 100 

On Jun 24, 11:40 pm, WaverBoy <waver....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 21, 1:02 pm, David Totheroh <dtothe....TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 21, 12:42 pm, WaverBoy <waver....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 21, 12:09 pm, "constance.kuriy...@ttu.edu"
>
> > > <constance.kuriy....TakeThisOut@ttu.edu> wrote:
> > > > I was amused by Robin Williams' reference to "the dance of the
> > > > potatoes." Strangely, some people do think the rolls are potatoes,
> > > > though I'd think they'd be rather heavy for such delicate
> > > > maneuvers.
>
> > > > And someone else seemed to think that Chaplin did that bit at
> > > > dinner parties *before* he filmed it. As far as I know there's no
> > > > evidence of that.
>
> > > > Connie K.
>
> > > But Roscoe Arbuckle might have.
>
> > Yes, and there were probably literally a few hundred film comedians
> > before Chaplin. So what? None of them did it anywhere near as well.
>
> Testy, aren't we?

Testy? Yes, in a way you're right. But from your response it is clear
to me you failed the test,...to *get* the double entendre sexual
inuendo inherent in my post.

>
> I'm well aware that everybody borrowed from everybody. Just a bit of
> humor, you old sod. :-)

Perhaps we're even. You'll have to explain to me what was even
remotely humorous about yours.
 >> Stay informed about: CC on AFI Top 100 

On Jun 25, 12:52 pm, David Totheroh <dtothe....DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 11:40 pm, WaverBoy <waver....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 21, 1:02 pm, David Totheroh <dtothe....DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 21, 12:42 pm, WaverBoy <waver....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 21, 12:09 pm, "constance.kuriy...@ttu.edu"
>
> > > > <constance.kuriy....DeleteThis@ttu.edu> wrote:
> > > > > I was amused by Robin Williams' reference to "the dance of the
> > > > > potatoes." Strangely, some people do think the rolls are potatoes,
> > > > > though I'd think they'd be rather heavy for such delicate
> > > > > maneuvers.
>
> > > > > And someone else seemed to think that Chaplin did that bit at
> > > > > dinner parties *before* he filmed it. As far as I know there's no
> > > > > evidence of that.
>
> > > > > Connie K.
>
> > > > But Roscoe Arbuckle might have.
>
> > > Yes, and there were probably literally a few hundred film comedians
> > > before Chaplin. So what? None of them did it anywhere near as well.
>
> > Testy, aren't we?
>
> Testy? Yes, in a way you're right. But from your response it is clear
> to me you failed the test,...to *get* the double entendre sexual
> inuendo inherent in my post.
>

Not exactly a witticism worthy of Groucho. Or even the Ritz Brothers.

>
> > I'm well aware that everybody borrowed from everybody. Just a bit of
> > humor, you old sod. :-)
>
> Perhaps we're even. You'll have to explain to me what was even
> remotely humorous about yours.- Hide quoted text -
>

I bet Charlie would have thought it was funny. Or didn't he have a
sense of humor?
 >> Stay informed about: CC on AFI Top 100 

On Jun 28, 11:21 pm, WaverBoy <waver... RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 12:52 pm, David Totheroh <dtothe... RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 11:40 pm, WaverBoy <waver... RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 21, 1:02 pm, David Totheroh <dtothe... RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 21, 12:42 pm, WaverBoy <waver... RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 21, 12:09 pm, "constance.kuriy...@ttu.edu"
>
> > > > > <constance.kuriy... RemoveThis @ttu.edu> wrote:
> > > > > > I was amused by Robin Williams' reference to "the dance of the
> > > > > > potatoes." Strangely, some people do think the rolls are potatoes,
> > > > > > though I'd think they'd be rather heavy for such delicate
> > > > > > maneuvers.
>
> > > > > > And someone else seemed to think that Chaplin did that bit at
> > > > > > dinner parties *before* he filmed it. As far as I know there's no
> > > > > > evidence of that.
>
> > > > > > Connie K.
>
> > > > > But Roscoe Arbuckle might have.
>
> > > > Yes, and there were probably literally a few hundred film comedians
> > > > before Chaplin. So what? None of them did it anywhere near as well.
>
> > > Testy, aren't we?
>
> > Testy? Yes, in a way you're right. But from your response it is clear
> > to me you failed the test,...to *get* the double entendre sexual
> > inuendo inherent in my post.
>
> Not exactly a witticism worthy of Groucho. Or even the Ritz Brothers.

Groucho was a pretty randy guy. I doubt he would have missed it so
completely as you obviously did.

>
> > > I'm well aware that everybody borrowed from everybody. Just a bit of
> > > humor, you old sod. :-)
>
> > Perhaps we're even. You'll have to explain to me what was even
> > remotely humorous about yours.
>
> I bet Charlie would have thought it was funny. Or didn't he have a
> sense of humor?

Not much of an explanation, IrresoluteLad. But relying on dead guys to
'justify' your own sense of humor, now that *is* funny. (And by the
way, in his personal life Charlie *was* seen as rather humorless by
those who knew him well.)
 >> Stay informed about: CC on AFI Top 100 

Oops, sorry, forgot to mention your incredibly clever play on words
with "test" and "testy". Keep it up, and you could be writing
material for twelfth-rate '60s Vegas lounge acts.
 >> Stay informed about: CC on AFI Top 100