mlanoue.RemoveThis@yahoo.com wrote:
>Interesting. I wonder if it was because
>Disney had absolutely no idea where to
>even start,
Yes, there was no precedent for a feature
length cartoon and Disney was a Hollywood outsider dealing with the
movie industry insiders of RKO, his distributor.
Chaplin had admired Disney from when
Disney released his films briefly through
United Artists.
What is lost now is how revolutionary
SNOW WHITE was. Audiences were
floored by it. The movie industry had
no idea what to make of it.
Many years later, Disney formed his own
distribution company, Buena Vista,
which continues to this day.
> or if it was because he felt he had
>something in common with Chaplin that
>would have made Snow White's
>distribution comparable to Modern Times.
I think this was a factor, too. Both
were movie industry mavericks and
innnovators who financed their own films.
And they admired each other
>Were they friends?
Not socially, but Disney was on record
as saying that Chaplin was his hero.
As is known, I have been very critical
of Chaplin, but I must say that this
was a very magnanimous gesture
on his part.
(I highly recommend the Gabler book
as an antidote to Schickel's
hatchet job.)
>> Stay informed about: "Ask Chaplin prices"