Shush wrote:
>You'll admit (I hope) that admiring Lenin
>in 1921 is one thing;
Not a very smart or discerning thing.
though.
> admiring him in 1961 or 1971 would've
>been something else again, and we don't
>know that Chaplin still felt that way after
>the facts about the early USSR were
>widely known.
We don't know, but I don't think he had
an antipathy towards the "Evil Empire."
Very little of Chaplin's actual views
has been recorded. You'd have to be in
his presence socially on a regular
basis to know for certain. I wonder
why Sydney has never written much
about his father. He probably knows
if dear old Dad ranted frequently against
the US or in favor of the Sovs.
Chaplin by all accounts was a domineering social figure. Oscar
Levant said "conversationally, he
was a one-man cadenza." We have
that anecdote from Joan Collins'
book where he forced her to look
at pictures of the Holocaust at a
dinner party. The host with the most!
Maybe someday someone will break
the 'omerta" about what CC really
was like and what he really thought.
Hints abound---but extrapolation
is still required. Agnosticism such
as your own can still pass muster.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Timeo Danaos et dona ferentis."
>> Stay informed about: "Citizen Chaplin" (a definitive mini-psychobiography)