"Dan Harris" <danharris.RemoveThis@NOSPAM.painted-moon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bnkdnh$6q4$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> "Ken Catchpole" <k.catchpole.RemoveThis@ich.ucl.ac.uk> wrote in message
> news:bnir6s$lt2$1@uns-a.ucl.ac.uk...
> > A recent DVD release that I'm after (Miller's Crossing) appears to have
> > "Dolby Digital (4.0) Surround" for region 2 and Dolby Digital 5.1 for
> Region
> > 1. By the look of it, DD5.1 would be better...but presumably only if
it's
> > mixed to use all 5.1 channels. As I've not come across DD4.0, does
anyone
> > have any idea:
> >
> > 1. Why this difference should exist.
> > 2. Whether there's a difference (or does "DD4.0" = DPL)?
> > 3. Which I should get.
> >
> > Ken.
> >
>
> 4.0 is Left, Right, Center and dual-mono Surround, with no LFE mix. It
> isn't exactly the same as DPL as it is "discrete monophonic" and there is
> no 4:2:4 encoding on the rear channels. i.e. the surround channel is
> independant of the front and not encoded within it.
>
> The 5.1 mix will have the dedicated LFE channel (the .1) and stereo rear
> channels.
>
> Dan
Thanks. Makes sense.
Ken.
>> Stay informed about: Dolby 4.0 vs 5.1