"Bobby Bloom" <bobby.bloom RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1136716494.769741.123340@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Hi, is there anyone, who could tell me sth about the thread of
> 'everyman' in Hitchcock's movies? The most obvious example is 'North by
> Northwest' - a reference to Kafka's novels and the model 'everyman'.
> But where else could I find the 'everyman'? Thanks, Bobby Bloom.
I used everyman recently I think, which to me implies an everyday, ordinary
person. I.e., not a king, a head of state, a famous actor, a known criminal,
etc. as opposed to an out and out reference, so I hope I didn't cause any
confusion using the term.
Almost all of Hitchcock's film contain some character (though not always the
main character) that fits this bill (and also Hitchcock may present them as
a "wrong man" - a character who is an everyman type who becomes a "someone"
(as far as the film is concerned anyway) by being thrust into a position
where they've been accused of a crime, etc.)
In Rear Window, Stewart's character is really just a Photographer who
happens to witness strange behavior at a neighbor's house.
In NxNW, Grant is just a businessman who gets mistaken for an agent.
In The Man who knew to much, the main character is just a guy on vacation
with his family, that happens to witness a murder and be given some
information.
In Rope, Stweart is just professor who gets invited to a party where
something has happened.
In Trouble with Harry, the main character is just an artist who happens upon
an apparently dead body.
In Vertigo, Stewart is just a cop who becomes embroiled in a scheme.
Then there's "The Wrong Man"!
Some characters are a little less "everyman", in that they might be a little
more important or well-known than the average Joe.
In Strangers on a Train, Granger's character is a normal guy, who happens to
be a Tennis Pro, but the idea is similar.
In to Catch a Thief, Grant is a famous (infamous) jewel thief.
In Torn Curtain, Newman is a scientist, but apparently well known enough to
be important as a defector.
In Notorius, Grant is a spy (let's say that's not a "everyday" job).
Sometimes, Hitch gives his "everyman" characters a bit of an Achille's heel,
weakness, sinful activity, or tainted past.
In Psyco, Marion is kind of just an average girl, but she's committed a
crime.
In the Birds, it seems that Tippi's character is not as truthful as she
should be.
In Dial M for Murder, the wife is having an affair.
So in these last cases, what happens to the character might be seen as
kharmic in some way.
Note of course that in some movies, there are multiple main characters and
ther may be a mix of "wrong men" and "everymen".
So I hope this is to what you were referring. If not, please ignore :-)
Best,
Steve
>> Stay informed about: "Everyman" by Hitchcock