Thanks Marty, however here's my question. I work NFL games and I see the
fins in the small communication tent set on the sideline for the officials.
The fins are stationary but the officials are not. Would the antennas in
similar situations be more effective if used manually to visually follow the
transmitters?
Nino
"Marty" <Marty RemoveThis @atscomms.com> wrote in message
news:3F29EB2A.6020508@atscomms.com...
> Directional antennas are generally used for stationery receivers. Hand
> holding and aiming a big paddle, Yagi or Log Periodic antenna on a stick
> would be far too difficult while moving around. Especially in an ENG
> situation when you are moving amongst other people and navigating
> obstacles while walking. Not to mention the wind gusts!
>
> When you see wireless cameras, the transmitters have omnidirectional
> antennas while the receive antennas are on stands or tripods.
>
> What you can do to increase gain, is to elevate the antennas, and keep
> the away from and above other objects. When transmitters are belt
> mounted, the RF energy is absorbed by the body. Sweat increases this
> effect. Receivers should be fitted into a mixer bag such that the
> antennas are above everything else and in the front of the bag (not
> between your body and the mixer). They should also be as far apart as
> possible. The antennas should be the correct length for the frequency in
> use, and on the Lectro's, one should be vertical, and one horizontal.
>
> Marty Atias
> ATS Communications
>
>
>
> Nino Giannotti wrote:
> > I'm trying to learn more about the use and added benefits of
> > supplementary/directional antennas for Lectro 200 and 210. The objective
is
> > to minimize hits either from fringe interferences and/or for distance.
For
> > the most the antennas would not be used as a stationary position but for
> > ENG. The sound operator would have to hold and direct the antenna (s). I
> > know that Lectro make a few models.
> >
> > Thanks gang
> >
> > Nino
> >
> >
>
> >> Stay informed about: External antennas