Welcome to MovieandPop.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

FILM DAILY's Ten Best Films

  
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Charlie Chaplin RSS
Related Topics:
Restoration of CC's films - From Our work of is based on a of the films. For each full length and short film, the finest elements available in the world are after which a study..

How many screwed up Chaplin films are there? - Sounds like most are. In anyone's 1. how many short films did Chaplin make and 2. how many of those were butchered for rerelease and original versions are now lost or to the public? Lets have some This info about a..

Make-up in Chaplin's films - Since Chaplin exercised such control over his pictures, I'm wondering if this extended to the make-up on the other actors? I'm assuming it did, but is there any evidence for this? I can easily picture Chaplin applying the desired make-up to..

Warner DVD Set: Beware, films are sped up! - After almost this entire set, I just learned that all the new DVDs are sped up by 4%. This is a disgrace to film buffs, and in the talkies it makes Chaplin's voice sound Stay away from this set if you want the..

_The Circus_ (and some other films) in San Francisco - I just returned home from my first of the San Francisco Silent Film Festival, July 10-11, where _The Circus_ (in 35mm)was the final offering on the program. The films were screened in a restored art deco theater, the Castro, which is
Next:  Charlie Chaplin: CITY LIGHTS and MODERN TIMES: How Successful?  
Author Message
Shush

External


Since: Dec 07, 2004
Posts: 222



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:01 pm
Post subject: FILM DAILY's Ten Best Films
Archived from groups: alt>movies>chaplin (more info?)
In the 1930s, FILM DAILY was possibly even more influential in film
industry circles than VARIETY.

Here are FILM DAILY's picks for the best films of the year, for 1931
and 1936:


1931:
CIMARRON
STREET SCENE
SKIPPY
BAD GIRL
MON AND BILL
THE FRONT PAGE
FIVE STAR FINAL
CITY LIGHTS
A FREE SOUL
THE SIN OF MADELON CLAUDET


1936:
MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY
MR. DEEDS GOES TO TOWN
THE GREAT ZIEGFELD
SAN FRANCISCO
DODSWORTH
THE STORY OF LOUIS PASTEUR
A TALE OF TWO CITIES
ANTHONY ADVERSE
THE GREEN PASTURES
A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM




--Shush--

 >> Stay informed about: FILM DAILY's Ten Best Films 
Back to top
Login to vote
Feuillade

External


Since: Jul 30, 2003
Posts: 221



(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:13 am
Post subject: Re: FILM DAILY's Ten Best Films [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
"Shush" shushfilmseznospam DeleteThis @yahoo.com writes:

> In the 1930s, FILM DAILY was possibly
> even more influential in film industry
> circles than VARIETY.

> Here are FILM DAILY's picks for the
> best films of the year, for 1931 and 1936:


> 1931:
> CIMARRON
> STREET SCENE
> SKIPPY
> BAD GIRL
> MON AND BILL
> THE FRONT PAGE
> FIVE STAR FINAL
> CITY LIGHTS
> A FREE SOUL
> THE SIN OF MADELON CLAUDET

> 1936:
> MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY

I thought "Mutiny on the Bounty" was 1935.

> MR. DEEDS GOES TO TOWN
> THE GREAT ZIEGFELD
> SAN FRANCISCO
> DODSWORTH
> THE STORY OF LOUIS PASTEUR
> A TALE OF TWO CITIES
> ANTHONY ADVERSE
> THE GREEN PASTURES
> A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM

I thought this was 1935 as well.


Tom Moran

"If exchange of ideas and contact with intelligent
minds is what one wants, one had better stay in
New York."
-- W.H. Auden

 >> Stay informed about: FILM DAILY's Ten Best Films 
Back to top
Login to vote
Shush

External


Since: Dec 07, 2004
Posts: 222



(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:02 pm
Post subject: Re: FILM DAILY's Ten Best Films [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Feuillade wrote:

> Shush writes:
> > 1936:
> > MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY
>
> I thought "Mutiny on the Bounty" was 1935.
>
> > A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM
>
> I thought this was 1935 as well.


Yes, both films premiered late that year. I don't know why FILM DAILY
lumped them among the 1936 films; maybe they earned most of their
grosses in 1936, and therefore the films were more conspicuous that
year than in '35.

My first guess was that they may have opened in exclusive runs in NY
and Los Angeles in '35, then went into wide release in '36, but I don't
think that was the case here.




--Shush--
 >> Stay informed about: FILM DAILY's Ten Best Films 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Charlie Chaplin All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
 You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]