On Mar 13, 2:13 am, Billy Sarokin <bigm....TakeThisOut@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Mar 10, 10:07 am, "Douglas Tourtelot" <tourte....TakeThisOut@speakeasy.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Oh wait. I don't neeed to buy one! My Lectrosonics receivers have one
> > built in<g>.
>
> One of the Shure systems interfaces with a computer with software very
> similar to my stand alone WinRadio analyzer. The Zaxcom radios will
> scan and find the best frequency, but the display is too small to show
> an entire 30 mHz block. The Lectros must be very large radios ;-)
> Seriously, when you are trying to find many small 300K spaces in a
> crowded 30-50 mHz wide spectrum it's much easier (imho) to use a stand
> alone or a computer based unit with a large display.
> Best,
> Billy
Some time ago Billy was talking about the WinRadio receiver and I went
out and bought one. (you still are a bad influence Billy!!!). I find
myself using it on jobs with multiple wireless systems operating and
most recently on a location shoot for a CBS live shot I was using four
wireless systems. Prior to the time of the live shot another 20-30
media persons joined us. I had marked my four wireless frequencies on
the WinRadio display and left the transmitters on. It was very nice
to be able to see the other wireless transmitters come up on the
screen from the various camera/sound persons. Before we began I had
to ask one crew to change frequency as they were transmitting on top
of one of my systems.
Was this WinRadio receiver needed, probably not, but it did mean I
could perform my job better with less last minute running around
changing radio frequencies. The shot went of with no audio hitches
and I am back for next year according to the producer. This will make
four years in a row. So being able to view our changing RF spectrum
is helpful though not always necessary. I see these various RF
spectrum analyzers as just another tool to make our job a little
easier.
David Rogers
>> Stay informed about: Frequency scanner