How about, "bigger than people AND it's normal-sized kind/is abnormally
sized"?
JAWS- not a giant.
MEG- a Giant, as there is only the one
Gwanji- not a giant, not bigger than any other of its kind
Anaconda- giant snake, but not a GIANT anaconda
Croc from Lake Placid- Giant?
C.
"Wolf" <bill.bussone.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ib6dnQXdVrZQGVHfRVn-hw@giganews.com...
> What makes a movie a "giant monster movie"?
>
> For instance, King Kong is generally regarded as a giant monster movie.
> (Mighty Joe Young is much more debatable) Jaws is not, even though Jaws
was
> both abnormally large and at least the size of King Kong. Is it because
Jaws
> was not that much larger than a standard great white, whereas Kong was
huge
> for an ape?
>
> Is it simply when the giantness is a plot point? If so, how large does it
> need to be to be a giant monster? Would the huge shrews in Attack of the
> Killer Shrews count, despite still being only dog-sized? They were
> comparatively larger than Kong was.
>
> Is it completely subjective?
>
>
> --
> |\-/|
> <0 0>
> =(o)=
> -Wolf
>
> >> Stay informed about: "Giant Monster Movie" separation?