Chaplin's "Imperfect" Technique

rfcsac627n RemoveThis @aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
wrote:

>>Connie K wrote:

>>>Mr. Shelps seems to think that
>>>everyone is adolescent but himself-- a
>>>classic case of projection.

>>No, mainly you...but Richard's effusive
>>praise of the adequate Cherrill did
>>seem to me to indicate a valentine crush,

>Not hard to see how someone with such
>a creepy obsession with Ann Coulter
>would see valentine crushes in others.

I've never written something as moony
as "she is perfection" about Coulter.

But as a matter of fact, I do maintain an
occasional e-mail correspondence with
AC---about our common political
views.
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

On May 31, 7:25 pm, G-HE... DeleteThis @webtv.net (George Shelps) wrote:
> rfcsac6... DeleteThis @aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
> wrote:
>
> >>Connie K wrote:
> >>>Mr. Shelps seems to think that
> >>>everyone is adolescent but himself-- a
> >>>classic case of projection.
> >>No, mainly you...but Richard's effusive
> >>praise of the adequate Cherrill did
> >>seem to me to indicate a valentine crush,
> >Not hard to see how someone with such
> >a creepy obsession with Ann Coulter
> >would see valentine crushes in others.
>
> I've never written something as moony
> as "she is perfection" about Coulter.

You've been drooling over her for years. It's really embarassing to
watch.
>
> But as a matter of fact, I do maintain an
> occasional e-mail correspondence with
> AC---about our common political
> views.

I'm sure she pines for every missive.
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

rfcsac6....DeleteThis@aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
wrote:


>>>>No, mainly you...but Richard's
>>>>effusive praise of the adequate
>>>>Cherrill did seem to me to indicate a
>>>>valentine crush,

>>>Not hard to see how someone with
>>>such a creepy obsession with Ann
>>>Coulter would see valentine crushes in
>>>others.

>>I've never written something as moony
>>as "she is perfection" about Coulter.

>You've been drooling over her for years.
>t's really embarassing to watch.

Never wrote about her in the same
breathless style you used about Cherrill.
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

On May 31, 8:39 pm, G-HE... DeleteThis @webtv.net (George Shelps) wrote:
> rfcsac6... DeleteThis @aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
> wrote:
>
> >>>>No, mainly you...but Richard's
> >>>>effusive praise of the adequate
> >>>>Cherrill did seem to me to indicate a
> >>>>valentine crush,
> >>>Not hard to see how someone with
> >>>such a creepy obsession with Ann
> >>>Coulter would see valentine crushes in
> >>>others.
> >>I've never written something as moony
> >>as "she is perfection" about Coulter.
> >You've been drooling over her for years.
> >t's really embarassing to watch.
>
> Never wrote about her in the same
> breathless style you used about Cherrill.

You did here.
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

rfcsac627n.DeleteThis@aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
wrote:

>>>You've been drooling over her for
>>>years. t's really embarassing to watch.

>>Never wrote about her in the same
>>breathless style you used about Cherrill.

>You did here.

Not in your gushing fanzine style.
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

On Jun 1, 11:45 pm, G-HE... DeleteThis @webtv.net (George Shelps) wrote:
> rfcsac6... DeleteThis @aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
> wrote:
>
> >>>You've been drooling over her for
> >>>years. t's really embarassing to watch.
> >>Never wrote about her in the same
> >>breathless style you used about Cherrill.
> >You did here.
>
> Not in your gushing fanzine style.

LOL! Let it go. Let....it....go.
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

rfcsac6....RemoveThis@aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
wrote:

>>>>>You've been drooling over her for
>>>>>years. t's really embarassing to watch.

>>>>Never wrote about her in the same
>>>>breathless style you used about Cherrill.

>>>You did here.

>>Not in your gushing fanzine style.

>LOL! Let it go. Let....it....go.

Since you, Connie, Moran, and Totheroh
chose to assault my character, motives,
and intellect because I didn't and
don't share your political worship of
Chaplin, I long ago decided to avoid
serious discussion with y'all....and
I now include Bachusio in that
"chaplinsta nostra."
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

On Jun 2, 11:01 am, Richard Carnahan wrote:
> On Jun 1, 11:45 pm, G-HE....DeleteThis@webtv.net (George Shelps) wrote:
> > rfcsac6....DeleteThis@aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
> > wrote:
> > >>>You've been drooling over her for
> > >>>years. t's really embarassing to watch.
> > >>Never wrote about her in the same
> > >>breathless style you used about Cherrill.
> > >You did here
> > Not in your gushing fanzine style.
> LOL! Let it go. Let....it....go.

Aw. Now see what you gone and done?

Sorry to say I told you so - but by engaging the Troll in
any way, all that happens is that he brings everything down to his
asinine, infantile, barbaric level.

Kuriyama posts an opinion about Chaplin's films - the Troll attacks
her maturity.
You post an opinion about Chaplin's films - he casts a bizarre
aspersion on you.

In between he defecates a few typical lies and falsehoods.

All the Troll knows how to do is snap, snarl, and lie. It's of a
piece
with his violent, barbaric ideology, which is at present creating
widows, orphans,
amputees by the hundreds every month.

And for who knows what reason, and to what end?

No need to wonder - the Troll and his glib fellow travelers come up
with a fresh new reason every fortnight.

But really, since 75% of the public has registered that they've seen
through the evil deceptions of the warmongers - and the resident Troll
has stated his intention to contribute nothing here but puerile
babytalk -
isn't it really best to shun him like the sad and sorry disgrace he
is?
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

On Jun 2, 8:30 pm, bachu....TakeThisOut@rogers.com wrote:
> On Jun 2, 11:01 am, Richard Carnahan wrote:
>
> > On Jun 1, 11:45 pm, G-HE....TakeThisOut@webtv.net (George Shelps) wrote:
> > > rfcsac6....TakeThisOut@aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>You've been drooling over her for
> > > >>>years. t's really embarassing to watch.
> > > >>Never wrote about her in the same
> > > >>breathless style you used about Cherrill.
> > > >You did here
> > > Not in your gushing fanzine style.
> > LOL! Let it go. Let....it....go.
>
> Aw. Now see what you gone and done?
>
> Sorry to say I told you so - but by engaging the Troll in
> any way, all that happens is that he brings everything down to his
> asinine, infantile, barbaric level.
>
> Kuriyama posts an opinion about Chaplin's films - the Troll attacks
> her maturity.
> You post an opinion about Chaplin's films - he casts a bizarre
> aspersion on you.
>
> In between he defecates a few typical lies and falsehoods.
>
> All the Troll knows how to do is snap, snarl, and lie. It's of a
> piece
> with his violent, barbaric ideology, which is at present creating
> widows, orphans,
> amputees by the hundreds every month.
>
> And for who knows what reason, and to what end?
>
> No need to wonder - the Troll and his glib fellow travelers come up
> with a fresh new reason every fortnight.
>
> But really, since 75% of the public has registered that they've seen
> through the evil deceptions of the warmongers - and the resident Troll
> has stated his intention to contribute nothing here but puerile
> babytalk -
> isn't it really best to shun him like the sad and sorry disgrace he
> is?

If there's anything we should have learned long ago, it's that Mr.
Shelps is incapable of letting things go. Nursing grudges, fighting
with and defaming his "enemies" gives him an excuse for living.

It's like those two old geezars in the nursing home who were always
at each other's throats. When one of them died, the other pined away
and died soon after.

Connie K.
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

On Jun 3, 7:20 am, G-HE... RemoveThis @webtv.net (George Shelps) wrote:
> Constance Kuriyama wrote:
> >If there's anything we should have
> >learned long ago, it's that Mr. Shelps is
> >incapable of letting things go. Nursing
> >grudges, fighting with and defaming his
> >"enemies" gives him an excuse for living.
>
> Sorry, lady, but you and your confreres
> (with new ones like Bachusio and old
> smear artists llike Moran) keep shifting
> the debate to the ad hominem whenever
> I disclose a viewpoint about Chaplin
> that you don't find congenial.

As evidenced by the first two posts in this thread?
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

Constance Kuriyama wrote:

>If there's anything we should have
>learned long ago, it's that Mr. Shelps is
>incapable of letting things go. Nursing
>grudges, fighting with and defaming his
>"enemies" gives him an excuse for living.

Sorry, lady, but you and your confreres
(with new ones like Bachusio and old
smear artists llike Moran) keep shifting
the debate to the ad hominem whenever
I disclose a viewpoint about Chaplin
that you don't find congenial.

And Bachusiohas drags
contemporary politics in on the slightest
provication. I don't see you declaring
him :off topic."
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

Bachusio barfed:

>But really, since 75% of the public has
>registered that they've seen through the
>evil deceptions of the warmongers -

And I'll bet that 75% of Americans thought
that Chaplin should have had his
re-entry permit lifted.

Since when is American governed by
pollsters.

The only poll that counts is the electoral
one and so let the congressional majority simply cut off the funds of
the "warmongers" if they've got the guts--
because they certainly have got the
power.
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique 

On Jun 3, 12:58 am, "constance.kuriy...@ttu.edu"
wrote:
> On Jun 2, 8:30 pm, bachu....DeleteThis@rogers.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 2, 11:01 am, Richard Carnahan wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 1, 11:45 pm, G-HE....DeleteThis@webtv.net (George Shelps) wrote:
> > > > rfcsac6....DeleteThis@aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>You've been drooling over her for
> > > > >>>years. t's really embarassing to watch.
> > > > >>Never wrote about her in the same
> > > > >>breathless style you used about Cherrill.
> > > > >You did here
> > > > Not in your gushing fanzine style.
> > > LOL! Let it go. Let....it....go.
>
> > Aw. Now see what you gone and done?
>
> > Sorry to say I told you so - but by engaging the Troll in
> > any way, all that happens is that he brings everything down to his
> > asinine, infantile, barbaric level.
>
> > Kuriyama posts an opinion about Chaplin's films - the Troll attacks
> > her maturity.
> > You post an opinion about Chaplin's films - he casts a bizarre
> > aspersion on you.
>
> > In between he defecates a few typical lies and falsehoods.
>
> > All the Troll knows how to do is snap, snarl, and lie. It's of a
> > piece
> > with his violent, barbaric ideology, which is at present creating
> > widows, orphans,
> > amputees by the hundreds every month.
>
> > And for who knows what reason, and to what end?
>
> > No need to wonder - the Troll and his glib fellow travelers come up
> > with a fresh new reason every fortnight.
>
> > But really, since 75% of the public has registered that they've seen
> > through the evil deceptions of the warmongers - and the resident Troll
> > has stated his intention to contribute nothing here but puerile
> > babytalk -
> > isn't it really best to shun him like the sad and sorry disgrace he
> > is?
>
> If there's anything we should have learned long ago, it's that Mr.
> Shelps is incapable of letting things go. Nursing grudges, fighting
> with and defaming his "enemies" gives him an excuse for living.
>

He's like Richard Nixon without the upside. Ans it doesn't matter if
you ignore him or engage him -- I've done both -- he's still there.
 >> Stay informed about: Chaplin's ""Imperfect"" Technique