Welcome to MovieandPop.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

"Keystone" by Louvish

 
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Silent Films RSS
Next:  Joseph L. Brierley  
Author Message
Lloyd Fonvielle

External


Since: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 241



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2003 9:32 pm
Post subject: "Keystone" by Louvish
Archived from groups: alt>movies>silent (more info?)

Just received my copy of the English edition, which is nothing special
physically. It's not bound in sewn signatures and the photographs,
printed within the text, are not exceptionally well reproduced. Unless
you're desperate to read it immediately, as I was, there's no reason not
to wait for the American edition due out here in February from the same
publisher. It will probably be identical and much cheaper.

I'm about a third of the way through a rereading of Robinson's Chaplin
biography, in the recent English paperback edition from Penguin which
has been slightly revised and updated since the editions published here.
It really is a wonderful book, filled with prodigious research but
very readable. While resolutely respectful of its subject, as one would
expect from an author who had the cooperation of the Chaplin estate, it
is thoughtfully critical of Chaplin when appropriate.
For example, Robinson fervently laments the cuts made to "The Kid"
in Chaplin's 70s version, and ill-advisedly retained in the recent
edition of the film on DVD. Robinson intimates, without elaborating,
that Chaplin was "persuaded" by someone to make these cuts, on the
grounds that the excised material was too sentimental for a modern
audience. I can't recall if he goes into the matter more fully later in
the book.
Robinson states incorrectly that Sennett never reshot scenes for
the Keystones out of creative concerns, and makes a signal blunder by
identifying Henry Lehrman as a chief prosecution witness against
Arbuckle in his manslaughter trial. In fact, Lehrman stayed as far away
from San Francisco as he could get, dallying with a new fiancee, while
issuing inflammatory proclamations to the press designed to vilify
Arbuckle in the public imagination and to paint Ms. Rappe as a paragon
of violated virtue. He was one of the scummier figures in the scandal,
but not from the witness stand.

 >> Stay informed about: "Keystone" by Louvish 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
keystone comedies - is there any chance of chaplin's comedies ( at keystone ) being released on dvd anytime soon. Rich

Stan and Pan/Bran? - I recently learned that Laurel and Hardy are known as Stan and Bran in Romania and Stan and Pan in Hungary. Other than the fact that it rhymes, does anyone know why Hardy would be called "Bran" or "Pan"? Thanks, David [for any per...

Joy Theatre New Orleans - Information for Documentary Need.. - The Joy Theatre in New Orleans, LA opened Feb 1947. There was an article concerning the opening of the theatre in that months or the next months issue of Box-office Magazine. We are trying to locate a copy of that article for a documentary film concernin...

Cinecon Suggestions - OK, I know these ideas are late for 2003 and so these suggestions may be an early request for the 2004, but here they are. I risk the 'Wrath of Richard,' but now after having been educated in the 'unwritten rules' of the Cinecon (hint: why not put them....

Is William Hooper related to Tobe Hooper? - Just asking....
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Silent Films All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]