|
Related Topics:
| "The Kingdom." Finally, some bad Arabs? - Has Hollywood grown less chicken? FBI Special Agent Ronald Fleury (Jamie Foxx) has just received the of his career: assemble an elite team (Jennifer Garner, Chris Cooper, Jason Bateman) to hunt down and capture the terrorist
Should Lindsay and her father share a jail cell? - Looks like papa Lohan is again making public overtures to his daughter, pleading with her to come back into the family fold. But this family isn't exactly what you would call Papa Lohan has quite a criminal past, including stints in..
Phoebe Cates' masturbation legacy continues into the next .. - We all fondly remember Phoebe Cates' character in Times at Ridgemont as the subject of Judge fantasy. Well, Phoebe has passed the torch on to the next in her family. Her son, Owen Kline, dishes..
I watched a good movie yesterday "Phonebooth" ... it remin.. - I watched a good movie yesterday ... it reminded me of something -- December 1999 Atlanta "It can be when the phone rings .. JEHKAL ... (Jehovah and Kali) - JEHKAL is the name of the God ... 2002 is an
|
|
|
Next: New Movies: Halloween (2007): Review. OMG!
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jun 12, 2007 Posts: 178
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:17 am
Post subject: "The Kingdom" friendly to the "cell phone" generation? Archived from groups: rec>arts>movies>current-films (more info?)
|
|
|
from Rottentomatoes.com
Willie Waffle
WaffleMovies.com
none of the three parts of this movie get a sufficient chance to
breathe, grow, add some depth and complexity or grab our attention for
more than a few minutes at a time.
John Thomason
Orlando Weekly
The Kingdom doesn't think much of its audience; it's one of those
movies that shows flashbacks of things that happened 30 minutes
earlier, in case we forgot. It retains its patronizing tone for the
drama as well as the comedy. >> Stay informed about: "The Kingdom" friendly to the "cell phone" generation? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 30, 2007 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:24 pm
Post subject: Jamie Foxx: short racist punk [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 30, 2007 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Jamie Foxx: short racist punk [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sep 30, 4:32 pm, Forge <fo... DeleteThis @diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote:
> In article <1191183842.999459.173... DeleteThis @g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> taxationistheft2... DeleteThis @lycos.com says...
>
> > "The Kingdom" disappointed at the box office. I hope they lose money
> > on this dog because Jamie Foxx is a racist punk who cannot carry a
> > movie.
>
> Yeah, he sure stunk up the place in "Ray."
>
> Um, except for the part where he completely didn't. At all. Ever.
Nobody paid to see "Ray"; Academy members got free dvds of it. It
made no money for the studio. It won recognition out of political
correctness.
Jamie Foxx is a little weasel.
The studio will lose money on "The Kingdom" and deserve to. >> Stay informed about: "The Kingdom" friendly to the "cell phone" generation? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 15, 2005 Posts: 172
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Jamie Foxx: short racist punk [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <1191183842.999459.173670 RemoveThis @g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
taxationistheft2003 RemoveThis @lycos.com says...
> "The Kingdom" disappointed at the box office. I hope they lose money
> on this dog because Jamie Foxx is a racist punk who cannot carry a
> movie.
Yeah, he sure stunk up the place in "Ray."
Um, except for the part where he completely didn't. At all. Ever. >> Stay informed about: "The Kingdom" friendly to the "cell phone" generation? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 30, 2007 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Jamie Foxx: short racist punk [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 07, 2005 Posts: 351
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Jamie Foxx: short racist punk [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:59:03 -0700, taxationistheft2003.TakeThisOut@lycos.com
wrote:
>On Sep 30, 4:32 pm, Forge <fo....TakeThisOut@diespammers.youneedageek.com> wrote:
>> In article <1191183842.999459.173....TakeThisOut@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
>> taxationistheft2....TakeThisOut@lycos.com says...
>>
>> > "The Kingdom" disappointed at the box office. I hope they lose money
>> > on this dog because Jamie Foxx is a racist punk who cannot carry a
>> > movie.
>>
>> Yeah, he sure stunk up the place in "Ray."
>>
>> Um, except for the part where he completely didn't. At all. Ever.
>
>Nobody paid to see "Ray"; Academy members got free dvds of it. It
>made no money for the studio. It won recognition out of political
>correctness.
>
>Jamie Foxx is a little weasel.
>
>The studio will lose money on "The Kingdom" and deserve to.
You're living in an alternate universe.
Thumper >> Stay informed about: "The Kingdom" friendly to the "cell phone" generation? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |

Joined: Apr 07, 2008 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 5:44 am
Post subject: Re: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|