|
Related Topics:
| | Reference to the number 4 in North by Northwest - Hey there. I watched my first Alfred Hitchcock movie last night. We noticed that the number 4 was a lot in this movie. Is there a website that I can go to that will tell me about the symbolism he uses in his movies? Thank you, and I'm sorry..
|
|
|
Next: Alfred Hitchcock: 1944 version of "The Lodger"
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:50 am
Post subject: Number 13
Archived from groups: alt>movies>hitchcock (more info?)
|
|
|
It's hard to feel any affection for this mess of a movie. The comedy
displayed by the silly actors (for want of a better word) fails to
amuse, and there are no moments of suspense to relieve the viewer from
straining to hear their inane lines from the poorly recorded sound. The
chase at the end is flat and confusing, and the editing throughout the
film is sloppy. I still say Hitchcock must have been kidnapped by a less
clever director. I'm glad he was released to make "The Man Who Knew Too
Much." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jan 13, 2005
Posts: 362
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:33 am
Post subject: Re: Number 13 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Mar 26, 12:50?am, West18j....RemoveThis@webtv.net (John) wrote:
> It's hard to feel any affection for this mess of a movie. The comedy
> displayed by the silly actors (for want of a better word) fails to
> amuse, and there are no moments of suspense to relieve the viewer from
> straining to hear their inane lines from the poorly recorded sound. The
> chase at the end is flat and confusing, and the editing throughout the
> film is sloppy. I still say Hitchcock must have been kidnapped by a less
> clever director. I'm glad he was released to make "The Man Who Knew Too
> Much."
It was all I could do to watch this film once and that was more than
enough wasted time. There are many other (but not all) Hitchcock
films that can be enjoyed again and again.
Rich |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 03, 2006
Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:16 am
Post subject: Re: Number 13 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Mar 26, 2:33 pm, bigsilent....RemoveThis@aol.com wrote:
> On Mar 26, 12:50?am, West18j....RemoveThis@webtv.net (John) wrote:
>
> > It's hard to feel any affection for this mess of a movie. The comedy
> > displayed by the silly actors (for want of a better word) fails to
> > amuse, and there are no moments of suspense to relieve the viewer from
> > straining to hear their inane lines from the poorly recorded sound. The
> > chase at the end is flat and confusing, and the editing throughout the
> > film is sloppy. I still say Hitchcock must have been kidnapped by a less
> > clever director. I'm glad he was released to make "The Man Who Knew Too
> > Much."
>
> It was all I could do to watch this film once and that was more than
> enough wasted time. There are many other (but not all) Hitchcock
> films that can be enjoyed again and again.
>
> Rich
Hi John and Rich:
Am I missing something?
Where did you get access to Hitchcock's film NUMBER 13?
I thought it was unfininished and that all footage was lost.
Best wishes,
- Vic >> Stay informed about: Number 13 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 26, 2005
Posts: 191
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:27 am
Post subject: Re: Number 13 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
What the?!
I obviously got confused. I thought they were talking about 'Number
Seventeen'.
Now that you mention it Vic, 'Number Thirteen' doesn't actually exist,
does it? .. or so I thought.
Fergal #.
On Apr 4, 1:16 pm, "Marmalade_man" <marmalade_... RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2:33 pm, bigsilent... RemoveThis @aol.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 26, 12:50?am, West18j... RemoveThis @webtv.net (John) wrote:
>
> > > It's hard to feel any affection for this mess of a movie. The comedy
> > > displayed by the silly actors (for want of a better word) fails to
> > > amuse, and there are no moments of suspense to relieve the viewer from
> > > straining to hear their inane lines from the poorly recorded sound. The
> > > chase at the end is flat and confusing, and the editing throughout the
> > > film is sloppy. I still say Hitchcock must have been kidnapped by a less
> > > clever director. I'm glad he was released to make "The Man Who Knew Too
> > > Much."
>
> > It was all I could do to watch this film once and that was more than
> > enough wasted time. There are many other (but not all) Hitchcock
> > films that can be enjoyed again and again.
>
> > Rich
>
> Hi John and Rich:
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Where did you get access to Hitchcock's film NUMBER 13?
> I thought it was unfininished and that all footage was lost.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> - Vic- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text - >> Stay informed about: Number 13 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 19, 2005
Posts: 110
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Number 13 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Sorry, looks like I jumped in without double checking. It was "Number
Seventeen" that we were slamming.
More proof that it's forgettable,
Rich >> Stay informed about: Number 13 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:26 am
Post subject: Re: Number 17 (was Number 13) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in/Register/Password
