On Jun 4, 1:43 pm, Harkness wrote:
> On Jun 4, 11:47 am, "Manco" wrote:
>
> > Harkness wrote:
> > > On Jun 3, 8:50 pm, "Manco" wrote:
> > >> I thought it was a thought-provoking film, however the obvious
> > >> leftist bent irritated me.
>
> > > Yeah, murderous fascist thugs just can't get a fair shake.
>
> > > John Harkness
>
> > FU
>
> Always a sign of someone who's just lost an argument.
No, no, no. Ill-defined terms lack conviction. Thugs as fascists are
in Mussolini or Basque, in totalitarian economic terms -- simply all
in a day of getting the work done. A Nazi is not to be confused, but
to be elevated, past and greater. Strong-arm intimidation, cells,
improvised ordinance, are the inferior marks to means nowhere near the
end. The end deserves a more suitable crown of achievement to put on
brilliant heads. Denouncing traitorous factions at the first general
assembly, then providing resulting attestations given sufficient
fervor complicit means to subsequently execute the former is, in
unequivocal lay terms, the end brilliance. Circumventing, in part,
any mealymouthed tenderization from academicians, such as Goebbels, to
an immediacy delegated in the dual-role Heydrich complimented. The
analogy to Saddham as dog to protector of the peoples, hence, is as
follows: as Nazified does to Doberman Pinscher to a crotch. Hope
that helps.
>> Stay informed about: Pan's Labyrinth