Welcome to MovieandPop.com!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Retrospective: The Exorcist (2000)

 
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Movie Reviews RSS
Next:  Retrospective: Charlie's Angels (2000)  
Author Message
Scott Mendelson

External


Since: Apr 23, 2007
Posts: 15



(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:50 pm
Post subject: Retrospective: The Exorcist (2000)
Archived from groups: rec>arts>movies>reviews (more info?)

"The Version You Should Probably See"

The Exorcist: The Version You've Never Seen
2000
133 min.
Rated R (for "strong language and disturbing images")

Scott Mendelson
With the widespread acceptance by the masses of DVD technology,
directors now have unrivaled opportunities to revisit and rework their
films in the years following the original theatrical release. In the
days of ole, reworked films were few and far between. While Steven
Spielberg kick started the trend in 1980 with Close Encounters of the
Third Kind: Special Edition, and Francis Ford Coppola seems to release
a new video edition of The Godfather Trilogy every few years, the
concept of new and improved movies was an uncommon phenomenon.
Alas, with seemingly every DVD of recent movies containing
deleted scenes, sometimes integrated back into the film, one must
question if a film is ever truly final. Indeed, word has it that
George Lucas and his ILM gang is presently working on the original
Star Wars Trilogy yet AGAIN. Yep... the Special Editions were still not
good enough. Coming soon, we may be presented with the Final
Editions. That is, until Lucas decides to add four or five more shots
of CGI and release Star Wars: Champion Edition Turbo.
Which brings us to The Exorcist: The Version You've Never Seen, which
is arguably the silliest sub-title for a reworked movie I have ever
heard. Aside from the re-mastered picture and sound, the major draw
for fans is around eleven minutes of new footage that was edited out
much to the chagrin of William Blatty, the author of the original
novel. As for the inclusions, they change little in regards to the
overall quality and structure of the film. The film is still as
effective as it ever was. Actually, thanks to the restoration, the
picture resembles a film released last week. The only giveaways to
the film's age are the occasional 1970s clothing and the constant
cigarette smoking of all the major characters.
The big question is, "Does the film still hold up after 27 years?"
The answer is, for the most part, yes. Although the special effects
are slightly dated and the shock scenes have been burned into the
national conscious, the film still scares because we care about the
characters involved. Because The Exorcist is squarely about real
people, dealing with this seemingly spiritual terrorism in an
otherwise real, authentic environment, the shock elements ring true
and remain effective. It is the simplest and most important rule in
horror filmmaking: If we care about the characters, we will be afraid
for them and thus afraid when bad things happen to them. Classic
horror films such as Jaws, The Sixth Sense, Rosemary's Baby, and The
Silence of the Lambs take the time to create real characters and real
environments where horrific elements conflict with everyday life.
Because it follows this most golden of rules, it is likely that The
Exorcist will never becoming truly dated. After all, good writing and
acting never go out of style.

Grade: A-

 >> Stay informed about: Retrospective: The Exorcist (2000) 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Review: Exorcist: The Beginning (2004) - "Exorcist: The Beginning" William Friedkin's seminal 1973 horror film about a young girl possessed by a demon and saved by an elderly priest and his assistant has scared and entertained millions for over 30 years. Now, Finnish helmer Renny Har...

Review: 28 Days Later (2002) - 28 DAYS LATER Reviewed by: Harvey S. Karten Grade: B- Fox Searchlight Films Directed by: Danny Boyle Written by: Alex Garland Cast: Cillian Murphy, Naomie Harris, Megan Burns, Brendan Gleeson, Christopher Eccleston, Screened at: Fox, NYC, 6/19/03 ..

Review: Hulk, The (2003) - Susan Granger's review of "The Hulk" (Universal Pictures) This is a mythic comic-book movie about a man at war with himself and the world. Brilliant scientist Bruce Banner (Australian actor Eric Bana) has so many acute emotional problem...

Review: "Julius Caesar" (2002) (mini) - Susan Granger's review of "Caesar" (four-hour TNT mini-series: June 29th and 30th) Julius Caesar is one of history's most fascinating and flawed figures. Filled with boundless ambition, his self-glorifying military exploits were legendar...

Review: Hollywood Homicide (2003) - "Hollywood Homicide" – Just Shoot Me by Homer Yen (c) 2003 Do actors like veteran Harrison Ford and hunky Josh Hartnett have enough star power to lure the moviegoing masses to a lighthearted buddy-comedy about cops, Hollywood, and murder? Wh...
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Movie Reviews All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]