"Highlandish" <ckreskay1_CURSING RemoveThis @dodo.com.au> wrote in message
news:45fef321$0$63289$c30e37c6@ken-reader.news.telstra.net...
> Quoth The Raven; ottobud <paul61 RemoveThis @gmail.com> in
> <1174317456.525706.292160 RemoveThis @e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
>> On Mar 19, 3:53 am, "Highlandish" <ckreskay1_CURS... RemoveThis @dodo.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>> Quoth The Raven; Benoît Meulle-Stef
>>> <bmsguitarsNOSP... RemoveThis @biz.scarlet.be>
>>> in <JbmdnaFKEs1nAGDYnZ2dnUVZ8v6dn... RemoveThis @scarlet.biz>
>>>
>>> >http://imdb.com/title/tt0489018/
>>>
>>> ???? why would he redo this a second time. i loved the original. now
>>> we're gunna get running smart zombies being experimented on instead
>>> of a dead, slow horde.
>>
>> Romero has nothing to do with the Day remake. It's being done without
>> any of his input. He *is* responsible for DIARY OF THE DEAD, which is
>> not a sequel to any of his original "dead" films, but is a sort-of
>> prequel/re-imagining of his first film, NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD
>> (1968).
>
> I saw his name in the credits as a writer, but I guess that is a throw
> back to say he was the original writer, not writing the film for the
> remake.
>
> --
> Remove the _CURSING to reply to me
>
> Love is like Pi: natural, irrational, and very important.
>
Did he not intend to get another point of view of his first "night of the
living dead" movie with the Diary of the dead? That's what I heard. Another
remake would be too much anyway, the 1990 remake was cool though and Barbra
was much more interesting than in the first movie.
--
Alucard
GAT d-@ s:- a-? C++ UL++ P+ L+ E++ W++>$ N K w++++>$ O- M- V- PS+ PE Y PGP t
5 X+ R+ ()R++ tv- b++ DI++ D+ G++ e h- r+ y++>$
www.calquemare.com >> Stay informed about: Romero last movie