I use omnis for my surround setup. I have 2 matched pairs of DPA4006
and 4051 that I use in a Quad setup. They are based on the same
capsules and sound more or less identical.
I´ve conmpared various 5.0, LCRS and Quad recording on a feature
mixing stage and found the quad setups most satisfying. Sometimes it´s
good to have a center but the mono-surround setup sound more narrow
than the stereo-surround setups.
I wouldn´t put too much energy and religion in wether schoeps or
neumann are better for a surround ambience rig. The most important
thing is to get the same mics for each channel to avoid different
colouration in each channel.
Another criteria is self-noise when you record quiet stuff.
I´ve a big fan of omni-mics. They have an avazing open sound and a
great width in both stereo and surround setups.
Frank.
Klaus Kellermann wrote:
> Hi!
> Would like to go for Surround and since my main microphone is a KMR 81i, I
> was wondering if I shouldn't switch over to Schoeps as long as it still
> makes sens. The nice thing about Neumann are the KM 184 for the rear
> channels because they are a lot cheaper then two 64s. Since I do almost only
> documentary work, there would also be the option of getting an extra KMR 82i
> for the price difference. I will try them both out, but funny enough you
> don't find them (Schoeps) that often arround here (Austria). We are mostly a
> Sennheiser/Neumann country when it comes down to location sound. I did work
> with Schoeps when I was recording classical singers once, but that's longer
> time ago.
> So any feedback would be cool!
> Thank you,
> Klaus >> Stay informed about: Did anybody ever do a serious Schoeps vs. Neumann test?