Welcome to MovieandPop.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

A Shocking Realization

 
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Charlie Chaplin RSS
Next:  New book about the Keystones and Essanays  
Author Message
Constance Kuriyama

External


Since: Jul 16, 2003
Posts: 671



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:45 pm
Post subject: A Shocking Realization
Archived from groups: alt>movies>chaplin (more info?)

Having been confronted with what is probably the one
hundredth reiteration of the accusation that Chaplin failed
to condemn Stalin along with Hitler, I have suddenly
realized that Chaplin, unlike the Three Stooges, who were
obviously far wiser, failed to condemn Hideki Tojo for
his actions as Minister of War and Prime Minister of Japan,
during which Tojo was instrumental in furthering Japan's
imperialist and expansionist policies in Asia, though he
was by no means the originator of those policies.

This means, of course, that Chaplin silently approved of
military dominance of parliamentary government, and
of Japanese hegemony in Asia. Otherwise he would have spoken
out against and condemned the Japanese invasion of Manchuria.
He never went on record as deploring the attack on Pearl Harbor,
either. Furthermore, he failed to announce his enthusiastic
approval when Tojo was tried and hanged for war crimes.

The obvious conclusion is that Chaplin was a closet
imperialist and war monger who hypocritically pretended to
be a peace monger. That explains his failure to condemn the
Soviet incursions in Eastern Europe. He supported not
communism, but military expanionism in any and all forms.

Chaplin unmaskled at last! It's amazing what miracles Shelpsian
logic can perform.

Connie K. (Whose study of Christopher Marlow has make her an
expert on idiotic theories. She devises one a week
just for fun.)
--
"To hell with the pillow in the background. It's a good scene, and that's
more important." Chaplin, Interview with Richard Meryman, 1966.

 >> Stay informed about: A Shocking Realization 
Back to top
Login to vote
Feuillade

External


Since: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 564



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:45 pm
Post subject: Re: A Shocking Realization [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Connie writes:

> The obvious conclusion is that Chaplin was a closet
> imperialist and war monger who hypocritically pretended
> to be a peace monger. That explains his failure to condemn
> the Soviet incursions in Eastern Europe. He supported not
> communism, but military expanionism in any and all forms.

You forgot the part about him being a drag queen -- for which we have
the evidence of several short films from the teens of the last century.

Tom Moran

 >> Stay informed about: A Shocking Realization 
Back to top
Login to vote
George Shelps

External


Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 886



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:45 pm
Post subject: Re: A Shocking Realization [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Constance Kuriyama wrote:

>This means, of course, that Chaplin
>silently approved of military dominance
>of parliamentary government, and of
>Japanese hegemony in Asia. Otherwise
>he would have spoken out against and
>condemned the Japanese invasion of
>Manchuria. He never went on record as
>deploring the attack on Pearl Harbor,
>either. Furthermore, he failed to
>announce his enthusiastic approval when
>Tojo was tried and hanged for war crimes.

>The obvious conclusion is that Chaplin
>was a closet imperialist and war monger
>who hypocritically pretended to be a
>peace monger

His "peace-mongering" was selective,
just like the recent Iraq protestors in
DC who condemned our war on terror
but praised Palestinian terror against
Israel,


>. That explains his failure
>to condemn the Soviet incursions in
>Eastern Europe. He supported not
>communism, but military expanionism in
>any and all forms.

>Chaplin unmaskled at last! It's amazing
>what miracles Shelpsian logic can
>perform.

You've really denegerated intellectually
over the years if you can float this
absurd false analogy.

We were at war with extremist nationalist regimes and Chaplin hated
nationalism.

His condemntion of Nazism can be
extended to the Japanese Empire
as well.

The Stooges attacked all forms of totalitarianism in their short films,
whereas Chaplin focused on the
right wing type only.

In that way, the lowly Stooges were
morally more astute,







++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Timeo Danaos et dona ferentis."
 >> Stay informed about: A Shocking Realization 
Back to top
Login to vote
Constance Kuriyama

External


Since: Jul 16, 2003
Posts: 671



(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 7:38 pm
Post subject: Re: A Shocking Realization [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Feuillade" (Feuillade@aol.com) writes:
> Connie writes:
>
>> The obvious conclusion is that Chaplin was a closet
>> imperialist and war monger who hypocritically pretended
>> to be a peace monger. That explains his failure to condemn
>> the Soviet incursions in Eastern Europe. He supported not
>> communism, but military expanionism in any and all forms.
>
> You forgot the part about him being a drag queen -- for which we have
> the evidence of several short films from the teens of the last century.
>
> Tom Moran

I was saving that juicy revelation for a later post, but now that
you've mentioned it, we can theorize that Chaplin's history of
marrying teenaged girls was actually a cover-up for his passion for
young boys. In _The Kid_ he came a little too close to the
truth, so the Tramp's erotic interest was displaced onto a sylph-like
Lita Grey, who was still in the pre-bra stage, and therefore resembled
a boy actor playing a female role far more than a mature female.

Ever wondered why Michael Jackson considers Chaplin a kindred
spirit?

That's two in one day, so I'm over my quota, but there's no limit to
how much BS one can concoct just by letting one's imagination run amok.

Connie K.
--
"To hell with the pillow in the background. It's a good scene, and that's
more important." Chaplin, Interview with Richard Meryman, 1966.
 >> Stay informed about: A Shocking Realization 
Back to top
Login to vote
James Neibaur

External


Since: Jul 13, 2003
Posts: 988



(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:04 pm
Post subject: Re: A Shocking Realization [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Constance Kuriyama 10/2/05 1:45 PM

> Chaplin, unlike the Three Stooges, who were
> obviously far wiser

Just when I think of a phrase I will never likely read, suddenly there it
is.

JN
 >> Stay informed about: A Shocking Realization 
Back to top
Login to vote
Constance Kuriyama

External


Since: Jul 16, 2003
Posts: 671



(Msg. 6) Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:33 am
Post subject: Re: A Shocking Realization [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

James Neibaur (jneibaur@wi.rr.com) writes:
> Constance Kuriyama 10/2/05 1:45 PM
>
>> Chaplin, unlike the Three Stooges, who were
>> obviously far wiser
>
> Just when I think of a phrase I will never likely read, suddenly there it
> is.
>
> JN

The world is full of possibilities, Jim. ;-)

Connie K.
--
"To hell with the pillow in the background. It's a good scene, and that's
more important." Chaplin, Interview with Richard Meryman, 1966.
 >> Stay informed about: A Shocking Realization 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Charlie Chaplin All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]