 |
|
 |
|
Next: Cheerleader Confessionals....Oh Yea!!
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Nov 30, 2005 Posts: 856
|
(Msg. 31) Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic [Login to view extended thread Info.]
|
|
|
RogerM <roger.mckay RemoveThis @ns.sympatico.ca> wrote in
news:4690F20E.8799FC8C@ns.sympatico.ca:
> Agent Smith wrote:
>>
>> RogerM <roger.mckay RemoveThis @ns.sympatico.ca> wrote in
>> news:4690D148.333A5240@ns.sympatico.ca:
>>
>> > Agent Smith wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, that organic webshooter decision was also a glaring mistake,
>> >
>> > You bet. If they are organic (Natural) they belong on his butt!
>> > Everything in the movies is a cheat.
>>
>> I don't know what that means,
>
> Which comment?
Both.
>> but Flash Thompson was also completely
>> wrong. Not that it doesn't also happen routinely in the comics, but
>> am I the only one who sees that his Spider sense never works in a
>> fight, but only when it's necessary to advance the plot. It it
>> really happened like it's supposed to, opponents would never lay a
>> glove on him, and he'd win every fight walking away. He could battle
>> Superman to a standstill, with no wussy power boost from Luthor.
>
> Well, I'm not an expert, certainly, but I thought it just alerted him
> to danger. Even if it gave him super reflexes (which spiders DON'T
> have, BTW), Spiderman has superspeed and that would overcome the
> reaction ability, right?
It wouldn't overcome it, but rather it would augment it, because they're
not working against each other, but in concert. However, I may be
conflatulating the traditional Spider Sense with the movie
interpretation, because, in the comic, and in the movie scene with Gobby
at the parade, his Spider Sense generally warns him of trouble when it's
on the other side of his visual horizon, but heading his way fast.
But in the incident at the lockers with Flash, it was used during the
fight, and when the punch was coming in Peter's direction, time just
slowed down, and all he had to do was step aside and watch it go past.
If that happened in every fight, no villain could ever touch him.
Yet villains land plenty of punches that he should theoretically be able
to see coming, well in advance, if you slow down time from the machine
gun speed of the fights. They did it in the first film, so he should
have plenty of time to spare, just like he did with Flash.
When I was in high school in '76, I wrote a letter to Marvel about the
selective functioning of his Spider Sense, but it was the only one of my
four letters that they declined to publish.
>> >> and your
>> >> other points are similarly easy to debate away. I expect all the
>> >> Marvel franchises to have legs equal to Batman and Superman, and
>> >> now that they're here, they'll never leave. Notice that
>> >> Hollywood's DC franchises are also expanding at breakneck speed,
>> >> with Supergirl, Jor-El and Green Arrow being regular characters on
>> >> Smallville and a talk of a JLA movie.
>> >>
>> >> All we really need are Green Lantern, The Atom and Hawkman, and
>> >> the ark will be fully populated. 'Course, I gotta thing for Tina
>> >> from the Metal Men, and not the Metropolis robot Tina, but the new
>> >> look, mod chick. She can polish my jewelry any time, if you know
>> >> what I mean.
>> >
>> > Metal Men! Wow, I don't see MM references very often. Loved them as
>> > a teen. Assuming it's the same group I'm thinking of.
>>
>> Do you like science?
>
> Yes. That was a major reason I liked the MM.
I suspected as much. What do you do?
>> The one thing that annoys me most about Hollywood is that THEY'RE ALL
>> FAGS!!! And by "FAGS!!!" I also mean that in the sense that het-men
>> use it to deprecate each other. GRAAAAAAhHHH!!!
>
> Well, acting and all is a rather sissy way to make a living. Once you
> have done some Shakespeare, there is no going back, I suppose.
There's some great lines in Romeo and Juliet, and if you memorize them
and pull them out of your ... hat ... on a moment's notice, the chicks
find it very seductive. But then, I guess that chicks love the gayboys,
don't they. Thank gawd for comics, with their raging cheescake hetero
tendencies, and thank gawd for the girls who like comics. >> Stay informed about: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 28, 2007 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 32) Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic [Login to view extended thread Info.]
|
|
|
In rec.arts.comics.marvel.universe Agent Smith <agent-smith DeleteThis @two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
> But in the incident at the lockers with Flash, it was used during the
> fight, and when the punch was coming in Peter's direction, time just
> slowed down, and all he had to do was step aside and watch it go past.
> If that happened in every fight, no villain could ever touch him.
Except if there was nowhere to step to. Or if there were too many
incoming attacks to dodge them all. Or if he was distracted by something.
Or if he had his hands full (of civilians, perhaps, or whatever). Or if
the attack was simply faster than he is. Or if he's too tired to keep
dodging. Or if he's already injured and thus moving more slowly. Or if he
chooses to take a punch in order to exploit a hole in his opponent's
defenses. Or if dodging would put him in an even worse position, for
whatever reason. Or if he's in the air and simply doesn't have the
traction he needs to change his trajectory. Or if he needs to take the hit
in order to protect nearby civilians. Or if he misinterprets the warning,
or simply decides to ignore it. Or if the warning isn't so strong as to
make him move instinctively. Or...
Well, you get the idea.
Just because he can sense it coming doesn't mean he can
automatically avoid it. Superman, for example, is simply too quick to
dodge; if he wants, he's far, far faster than Spider-Man. This is a guy
who can, depending on the depiction, give the Flash (Not the jock. The
other guy.) a run for his money, or at least keep up pretty well.
(Not that I think that the spider-sense has been handled terribly
consistently over the years, but then that applies to most superpowers
possessed by most superheroes.)
> But then, I guess that chicks love the gayboys, don't they.
Well, okay.
- Mikki >> Stay informed about: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 30, 2005 Posts: 856
|
(Msg. 33) Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic [Login to view extended thread Info.]
|
|
|
RogerM <roger.mckay.RemoveThis@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote in
news:46914BA5.CD0BEE8D@ns.sympatico.ca:
> Agent Smith wrote:
>>
>> RogerM <roger.mckay.RemoveThis@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote in
>> news:4690F20E.8799FC8C@ns.sympatico.ca:
>>
>> > Agent Smith wrote:
>> >>
>> >> RogerM <roger.mckay.RemoveThis@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote in
>> >> news:4690D148.333A5240@ns.sympatico.ca:
>> >>
>> >> > Agent Smith wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yeah, that organic webshooter decision was also a glaring
>> >> >> mistake,
>> >> >
>> >> > You bet. If they are organic (Natural) they belong on his butt!
>> >> > Everything in the movies is a cheat.
>> >>
>> >> I don't know what that means,
>> >
>> > Which comment?
>>
>> Both.
>
> A spider's spinnerets are on back end of the abdomen. Certainly NOT on
> the forelimbs.
I thought that it was some sort of confusing toilet humor.
> I have yet to see a film which was truly faithful to the plot and
> characterizations of the source material. I have heard that the first
> Harry Potter film was, but I have no knowledge of the books.
The Hairless Pothead books have been out long enough that the kids who
read the first ones early on will be in college soon. Emma Watson turns
eighteen on tax day next year, becoming fair game for all of us pervy
internet geezers.
>> >> Do you like science?
>> >
>> > Yes. That was a major reason I liked the MM.
>>
>> I suspected as much. What do you do?
>
> Nothing in the scientific fields. It is purely a hobby.
Which field(s) interest you most.
>> >> The one thing that annoys me most about Hollywood is that THEY'RE
>> >> ALL FAGS!!! And by "FAGS!!!" I also mean that in the sense that
>> >> het-men use it to deprecate each other. GRAAAAAAhHHH!!!
>> >
>> > Well, acting and all is a rather sissy way to make a living. Once
>> > you have done some Shakespeare, there is no going back, I suppose.
>>
>> There's some great lines in Romeo and Juliet, and if you memorize
>> them and pull them out of your ... hat ... on a moment's notice, the
>> chicks find it very seductive. But then, I guess that chicks love
>> the gayboys, don't they.
>
> That would explain the popularity of boy bands.
And Donny Osmond. Such chicks remind me of Rachel Dratch's SNL
character, The Girl with No Gaydar, which I occasionally point out. >> Stay informed about: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 09, 2007 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 34) Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic [Login to view extended thread Info.]
|
|
|
On Jun 26, 12:24 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
> However, the one thing that I will not accept is the absence of the
> Ultimate Nullifier, as the Maguffin that chases Galactus away. No
> explanation the writers could invent would be sufficient for that. This
> opens the question of how Mr. Fantastic can get the Nullifier without
> the help of The Watcher, because he does not yet exist, in Marvel's
> Movie Universe.
I wish that in the first movie the FF had gotten their powers while
Reed was trying to explore the Negative Zone. Then in the second
movie they could have had the Surfer send the Torch into the Negative
Zone to get the Ultimate Nullifier which the Surfer could have then
used against Galactus. This would have been closer to the original
without having to introduce the Watcher. >> Stay informed about: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 30, 2005 Posts: 856
|
(Msg. 35) Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic [Login to view extended thread Info.]
|
|
|
Invid Fan <invid.RemoveThis@localnet.com> wrote in
news:090720070124461368%invid@localnet.com:
> In article <Xns996798C2EF6C9agentsmithtwoblockso.RemoveThis@207.115.33.102>,
> Agent Smith <agent-smith.RemoveThis@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
>
>> There's some great lines in Romeo and Juliet, and if you memorize
>> them and pull them out of your ... hat ... on a moment's notice, the
>> chicks find it very seductive. But then, I guess that chicks love
>> the gayboys, don't they. Thank gawd for comics, with their raging
>> cheescake hetero tendencies, and thank gawd for the girls who like
>> comics.
>
> From the 'Reefer Madness' musical:
>
> Jimmy:
> I need words to tell you 'bout my pounding heart
> Four dollar words that make a guy sound smart
> Oh, I guess that's why they invented Shakespeare!
> His articulations of a lover's palpitations are so keen!
>
> My bounty is as boundless as the sea!
> My love as deep the more I give to thee!
>
> Mary:
> Oh, you sound so dreamy when you talk like Shakespeare!
>
> Both:
> A big vocabulary should be customary when you fall in love!
>
> Jimmy:
> La la la la la la, you're a snowy dove!
>
> Mary:
> La la la, prodigious birth of love!
>
> Both:
> La la la la la, hip hooray for Shakespeare!
> Sure as I am breathing, you sure make Elizabethan language fun!
> We are just like Romeo and Juliet
> We're happy, young and bubbling with love!
>
> Jimmy:
> I can't wait to read the ending!
>
> Mary:
> I can't either! But I'm sure it turns out real swell
> I bet Romeo marries his Juliet
>
> Jimmy:
> They have a baby
>
> Mary:
> And make lots of friends!
>
> Both:
> That's prob'ly the way the play ends!
>
> Mary:
> You doth teach the torches how to burn real bright
>
> Jimmy:
> Hanging like a jewel upon the cheek of night!
>
> Both:
> Hark! What light through yonder window breaks here
> We'll be future spouses
> Put a plague on both our houses if we're wrong!
> Shakespeare!
Do they say the lines in iambic pentameter, and why isn't there a line
about admitting impediments to the marriage of two minds, so that love
doesn't alter where it alteration finds, nor bear with the remover to
remove? >> Stay informed about: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 30, 2005 Posts: 856
|
(Msg. 36) Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 7:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic [Login to view extended thread Info.]
|
|
|
BCattivabrutto <BCattivabrutto.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1184017523.174838.326630@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
> On Jun 26, 12:24 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
> left.com> wrote:
>
>> However, the one thing that I will not accept is the absence of the
>> Ultimate Nullifier, as the Maguffin that chases Galactus away. No
>> explanation the writers could invent would be sufficient for that.
>> This opens the question of how Mr. Fantastic can get the Nullifier
>> without the help of The Watcher, because he does not yet exist, in
>> Marvel's Movie Universe.
>
> I wish that in the first movie the FF had gotten their powers while
> Reed was trying to explore the Negative Zone. Then in the second
> movie they could have had the Surfer send the Torch into the Negative
> Zone to get the Ultimate Nullifier which the Surfer could have then
> used against Galactus. This would have been closer to the original
> without having to introduce the Watcher.
Why can't the Surfer get the Nullifier himself? IMO, there's no
permissible resolution without The Watcher, because all options distort
the canon in some way. >> Stay informed about: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 09, 2007 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 37) Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic [Login to view extended thread Info.]
|
|
|
On Jul 9, 6:59 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:
> BCattivabrutto<BCattivabru... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote innews:1184017523.174838.326630@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>
> Why can't the Surfer get the Nullifier himself? IMO, there's no
> permissible resolution without The Watcher, because all options distort
> the canon in some way.- Hide quoted text -
>
Having the Torch get the Nullifier follows the Canon, lets one of the
FF actually "defeat" Galactus, and sets up one premise for the next
movie where the Torch is affected by his cosmic voyage through
Negative Zone (in other words, some character development). >> Stay informed about: Silver Surfer Movie vs. Comic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | | Bad Feeling about Silver Surfer - From the trailers, he looks bizarre and inhuman, and might inspire revulsion in people. He may not inspire the intrigue and awe, that his psychedelic imagery did in the 60's. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|