Sir Blob (get a life)

"Thomas G. Marshall"
wrote:

>Let's pretend that I *live* to admonish others. I admonish my friends. I
>admonish my cat. I anthropomorphise my door so I can admonish it for
>squeaking. It doesn't change what I'm saying, so this is why I was confused
>by this response. It took me a while to figure out what it was you're
>talking about, and it does not affect my argument.

I often wrap my fiendishly complex ideas in a simple dough of sugary
goodness.

>There is a desire among most (put me in the mix I don't care!) to admonish
>others when there is a perceived notion by the admonisher that he will have
>popular support. Call it some sort of common human nature. I often believe
>that the arguments themselves will not hold water on their own. I think
>that the logic that should support them is skewed by the desire to admonish.
>What I was saying does not have popular support, so it does not by
>definition fall into the dynamic I was talking about.

I agree with this post.







____
Look, if I said I liked you, would you let me go?

-- Chaucer, to innkeeper

Just sit still.

-- Innkeeper's reply