"McLellan" wrote in message
> Very fair point, and I appreciate your point of view. But because Kubrick
> allowed the film to be released and shown almost everywhere else, he only
> pulled it from the UK, I still think it's important to differentiate
between
> the Director choosing not to release his own work for personal reasons and
> an authority "banning" a picture which implies to many that the content
was
> deemed unsuitable for the public. I wanted to clarify this, especially for
> other readers of this group who may not have your knowlege of the films
> history. - no offence implied and (I hope) taken ?
>
> Andy
Absolutely none taken Andy. And I apologies if I gave the impression that I
did. In fact, it's refreshing to be simply discussing films again on this ng
.. It has been so quiet recently that on topic debate has become a bit of a
rarity. :-)
>> Stay informed about: Straw Dogs