Welcome to MovieandPop.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Charlie Chaplin RSS
Next:  Los Angeles TV SHOW!!!!!  
Author Message
Ronnie

External


Since: Sep 24, 2005
Posts: 15



(Msg. 61) Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: rec>arts>movies>past-films, others (more info?)

This message is not archived

 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Harkness

External


Since: Oct 20, 2005
Posts: 945



(Msg. 62) Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 12:14 am
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 22 Oct 2005 20:10:52 -0700, "tomcervo" <tomcervo DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote:

>>Has there ever been a movie where the main character turned out to be a figment of a >supporting character's imagination?
>
>
>The Usual Suspects?
>Lt. Kije?
>
>Oh, and Vertigo

Only if you define James Stewart's character as "supporting"

John Harkness

 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
tomcervo

External


Since: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 804



(Msg. 63) Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:15 am
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

>>Oh, and Vertigo
>Only if you define James Stewart's character as "supporting"


Tom Helmore's imagination; Stewart's obsession.
(I mean, do we really know that the real Madeline is mad?)
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
Constance Kuriyama

External


Since: Jul 16, 2003
Posts: 671



(Msg. 64) Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 4:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>movies>chaplin (more info?)

"tomcervo" (tomcervo@aol.com) writes:
>>Has there ever been a movie where the main character turned out to be a figment of a >supporting character's imagination?
>
> The Usual Suspects?
> Lt. Kije?
>

Sose is real--insofar an anything in that film is real. We just don't know
who he is until . . . .

Connie K.
--
"To hell with the pillow in the background. It's a good scene, and that's
more important." Chaplin, Interview with Richard Meryman, 1966.
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
zaryzary2003

External


Since: Oct 23, 2005
Posts: 102



(Msg. 65) Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 7:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>arts>movies>past-films, others (more info?)

John Harkness wrote:
> The Dear Hunter

That must be the movie about that really swell guy, that Dear Hunter. ;)
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
zaryzary2003

External


Since: Oct 23, 2005
Posts: 102



(Msg. 66) Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 7:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

tomcervo wrote:
> Much better than the book, which consists of DESCRIPTIONS of the
> action scenes.

Maybe I'm not being creative enough, but how else would a book portray
action other than by describing it?
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
mikegebert

External


Since: Oct 20, 2005
Posts: 720



(Msg. 67) Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 7:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Basic writer advice. Don't just tell, show. Or as Mark Twain put it,
"Don't say that Grandma screamed. Bring the old lady on and let her
scream."
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
zaryzary2003

External


Since: Oct 23, 2005
Posts: 102



(Msg. 68) Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 7:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Feuillade wrote:
> John Harkness wrote:
>
> > Just off the top of my head, for the first 20
> > or so, Magnolia, Pulp Fiction, One False Move,
> > Safe, Goodfellas, Unforgiven, seven, There's
> > Something About Mary, The Big Lebowski, hree
> > Kings, Miller's Crossing, Almost Famous, Die
> > Hard, Chasing Amy, Do The Right Thing, Heat,
> > LA Confidential, Living Out Loud, Adaptation,
> > The Siege, Miller's Crossing
>
> I *knew* I didn't want to hear it. :)


I suppose there's no accounting for taste, but do you have any
arguments why you think those movies aren't as good as "Avalon"? Other
than, "Because I like 'Avalon' more'" of course.
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
bbcrock

External


Since: Oct 21, 2005
Posts: 67



(Msg. 69) Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 9:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

We'll have to agree to disagree about Truman, because I don't think
Carrey was the best actor of that year. And as far as the knotty
psychological concepts like reality and god, I was much more profoundly
affected by the original Planet of the Apes than Truman Show, I felt TS
rehashed a lot of standard stuff. And of course, since American Family
is not a fictional movie, I WAS comparing them tongue-in-cheek. What
my point sort of was, was that the film rehashed a lot of themes under
the promotional materials' guise that it was original.

And as for Avalon and particularly that scene, I wrote a paper on it
around 10 years ago or so and watched it maybe 5-10 times for the
paper- certainly watched many sequences 10 times anyway. I was not
blown away by Quinn in the film and I don't remember his reaction
communicating that impression, just don't remember it that way. I
remember him ignoring his son, just saying, "no, it happened this way."
Couldn't find any ciritics commenting on it online.

Don
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
William Ferry

External


Since: Oct 23, 2005
Posts: 100



(Msg. 70) Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Hey! The first rule of Fight Club is you never talk about Fight Club!

--

Yours for bigger and better silents,
Bill Ferry


"Ronnie" <our-own-ronnie-bateman.TakeThisOut@earthlinq.net> wrote in message
news:our-own-ronnie-bateman-7BC853.13282622102005@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> "FredT" <fwtep.TakeThisOut@hotmailx.com> wrote:
>
> > I would have loved it if when Jennifer Connolly was committing him to
the
> > institution, saying that he has hallucinated his best friend, the Doctor
> > looked at her and said that she didn't have a husband, that it was all
an
> > hallucination. That would have really been a twist. Has there ever
been a
> > movie where the main character turned out to be a figment of a
supporting
> > character's imagination? (And Harvey doesn't qualify, because he turns
out
> > to be real.)
>
> Obvious answer: Fight Club.
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Harkness

External


Since: Oct 20, 2005
Posts: 945



(Msg. 71) Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 11:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 23 Oct 2005 19:42:42 -0700, zaryzary2003 RemoveThis @yahoo.com wrote:

>
>Feuillade wrote:
>> John Harkness wrote:
>>
>> > Just off the top of my head, for the first 20
>> > or so, Magnolia, Pulp Fiction, One False Move,
>> > Safe, Goodfellas, Unforgiven, seven, There's
>> > Something About Mary, The Big Lebowski, hree
>> > Kings, Miller's Crossing, Almost Famous, Die
>> > Hard, Chasing Amy, Do The Right Thing, Heat,
>> > LA Confidential, Living Out Loud, Adaptation,
>> > The Siege, Miller's Crossing
>>
>> I *knew* I didn't want to hear it. :)
>
>
>I suppose there's no accounting for taste, but do you have any
>arguments why you think those movies aren't as good as "Avalon"? Other
>than, "Because I like 'Avalon' more'" of course.

Avalon has more old ethnic guys bitching about how things were better
in the old country.

John Harkness
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
Feuillade

External


Since: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 564



(Msg. 72) Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:13 am
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

zaryzary2003 RemoveThis @yahoo.com wrote:

> Feuillade wrote:

>> John Harkness wrote:

>>> Just off the top of my head, for the first 20
>>> or so, Magnolia, Pulp Fiction, One False Move,
>>> Safe, Goodfellas, Unforgiven, seven, There's
>>> Something About Mary, The Big Lebowski, hree
>>> Kings, Miller's Crossing, Almost Famous, Die
>>> Hard, Chasing Amy, Do The Right Thing, Heat,
>>> LA Confidential, Living Out Loud, Adaptation,
>>> The Siege, Miller's Crossing

>> I *knew* I didn't want to hear it. :)

> I suppose there's no accounting for taste, but do
> you have any arguments why you think those movies
> aren't as good as "Avalon"? Other than, "Because
> I like 'Avalon' more'" of course.

Do I have arguments? Yes.

Am I willing to spend the time to make them and then the much longer
time to defend them? Not particularly. I might have made that
argument a few years ago, but not now.

Mainly because, as you say, there's no accounting for taste.

Tom Moran
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
Feuillade

External


Since: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 564



(Msg. 73) Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:14 am
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

John Harkness wrote:

> Avalon has more old ethnic guys bitching about
> how things were better in the old country.

If that's all you saw in that movie I find that deeply sad.

Tom Moran
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
Feuillade

External


Since: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 564



(Msg. 74) Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:45 am
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

John Harkness wrote:

> On 24 Oct 2005 05:14:49 -0700, "Feuillade" <Feuillade.RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote:

>> John Harkness wrote:

>>> Avalon has more old ethnic guys bitching about
>>> how things were better in the old country.

>> If that's all you saw in that movie I find that
>> deeply sad.

> On the grand scale, that's basically what it's about.
> He's trying to excorcise his family but sinks into nostalgia.

That's a little like saying that "Citizen Kane" is about a guy who
never got over losing his sled.

Tom Moran
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Harkness

External


Since: Oct 20, 2005
Posts: 945



(Msg. 75) Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:50 am
Post subject: Re: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 24 Oct 2005 05:14:49 -0700, "Feuillade" <Feuillade.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote:

>John Harkness wrote:
>
>> Avalon has more old ethnic guys bitching about
>> how things were better in the old country.
>
>If that's all you saw in that movie I find that deeply sad.
>
>Tom Moran

On the grand scale, that's basically what it's about. He's trying to
excorcise his family but sinks into nostalgia.

Woefully miscast central role -- I just don't buy Aidan Quinn as,
well, Jewish,not surrounded by the like of Kevin Pollack and Lou
Jacobi.

And since she said it better than I do, I'll just name-check Pauline
Kael's review...

"The scattered fine comic moments don't meke up for the wide streak of
fuddy-duddyism in the film's notion that the family used to be the
bulwark of the nation's value system. The movie is an elegy to a
mythical past, and people emerge from the theatre sniffling. They've
been told they're suffering from sould-sickness -- the loss of unity,
harmony, family music"

John Harkness
 >> Stay informed about: Worst Film That Won and Best Film Never Nominated 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Is it my DVD player, the film or my eyesight? - When watching some of the DVDs on the "Chaplin Revue" (the newly restored two-disc set), I noticed that at times the action seems to slow certain random moments. The Tramp will be doing something at one speed, and then the film momentarily slo...

FILM DAILY's Ten Best Films - In the 1930s, FILM DAILY was possibly even more influential in film industry circles than VARIETY. Here are FILM DAILY's picks for the best films of the year, for 1931 and 1936: 1931: CIMARRON STREET SCENE SKIPPY BAD GIRL MON AND BILL THE FRONT PAGE..

BRONCHO BILLY AND THE ESSANAY FILM COMPANY - Hollywood's trail head Broncho Billy and the Essanay Film Company David Kiehn Farwell Books: 448 pp., $32.50 By Richard Schickel, Richard Schickel is the author of several books, including "Woody Allen: A Life in Film," and reviews movies fo...

Harold Lloyd at NYC's Film Forum - The new Film Forum schedule is going to be a good one for New York movie fans. But for silent buffs, the big news is the upcoming Harold Lloyd retrospective. Four weeks of Lloyd in Lower Manhattan. The festival runs from April 20 to May 17. The films...
   Movie Forums (Home) -> Charlie Chaplin All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Page 5 of 6

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]