Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine?

Phil P wrote:
> On 1 Jul 2006 16:50:44 -0700, "David B. Pearson" <pearson RemoveThis @silent-movies.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >I very much miss the LIMELIGHT newsletter/magazine.
>
> As do I. And people who don't know what an enormous effort went into publishing
> it shouldn't be so quick to condemn.

Indeed, I've been involved in many dozens of such projects.
Not one of them could be called easy, and most were hellish.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

Doug Sulpy wrote:
> In article <9o4ea290jnq497q38vnkakjfb4b6ou7npm.RemoveThis@4ax.com>, Phil P wrote:
>
> > On 1 Jul 2006 16:50:44 -0700, "David B. Pearson" <pearson.RemoveThis@silent-movies.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >I very much miss the LIMELIGHT newsletter/magazine.
> >
> > As do I. And people who don't know what an enormous effort went into
> > publishing
> > it shouldn't be so quick to condemn.
>
> By "people who don't know," I presume you mean George, who did not in
> any way "condemn" the publication. All he did is ask what's going on
> with it - a question which could easily have been answered by David.

This is what George originally wrote:
>> what has happened to Ms
>>McCourt? She used to lumber out
>>onto the group every so often to
>>lambaste me.

Everyone knows what he was up to.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

George Shelps wrote:
> rfcsac627n.TakeThisOut@aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
> wrote:
>
> >>>On 1 Jul 2006 16:50:44 -0700, "David
> >>>B. Pearson"
> >>><pearson.TakeThisOut@silent-movies.com> wrote:
>
> >>I very much miss the LIMELIGHT
> >>newsletter/magazine.
>
> >>>As do I. And people who don't know
> >>>what an enormous effort went into
> >>>publishing it shouldn't be so quick to
> >>>condemn.
>
> >>By "people who don't know," I presume
> >>you mean George, who did not in any
> >>way "condemn" the publication. All he
> >>did is ask what's going on with it - a
> >>question which could easily have been
> >>answered by David.
>
> > This is what George originally wrote:
> >> what has happened to Ms
> >>McCourt? She used to lumber out
> >>onto the group every so often to
> >>lambaste me.
>
> > Everyone knows what he was up to.
>
> Doug is correct. I obviously didn't "condemn" the magazine. I think it
> was good work actually.

How would you know? You never bought a single issue.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

rfcsac627n.DeleteThis@aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
wrote:

>>>On 1 Jul 2006 16:50:44 -0700, "David
>>>B. Pearson"
>>><pearson.DeleteThis@silent-movies.com> wrote:

>>I very much miss the LIMELIGHT
>>newsletter/magazine.

>>>As do I. And people who don't know
>>>what an enormous effort went into
>>>publishing it shouldn't be so quick to
>>>condemn.

>>By "people who don't know," I presume
>>you mean George, who did not in any
>>way "condemn" the publication. All he
>>did is ask what's going on with it - a
>>question which could easily have been
>>answered by David.

>      This is what George originally wrote:
>>  what has happened to Ms
>>McCourt? She used to lumber out
>>onto the group every so often to
>>lambaste me.

>    Everyone knows what he was up to.

Doug is correct. I obviously didn't "condemn" the magazine. I think it
was good work actually.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

David Totheroh wrote:
> George Shelps wrote:
> > rfcsac627n DeleteThis @aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
> > wrote:
> >
> > >>>On 1 Jul 2006 16:50:44 -0700, "David
> > >>>B. Pearson"
> > >>><pearson DeleteThis @silent-movies.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>I very much miss the LIMELIGHT
> > >>newsletter/magazine.
> >
> > >>>As do I. And people who don't know
> > >>>what an enormous effort went into
> > >>>publishing it shouldn't be so quick to
> > >>>condemn.
> >
> > >>By "people who don't know," I presume
> > >>you mean George, who did not in any
> > >>way "condemn" the publication. All he
> > >>did is ask what's going on with it - a
> > >>question which could easily have been
> > >>answered by David.
> >
> > > This is what George originally wrote:
> > >> what has happened to Ms
> > >>McCourt? She used to lumber out
> > >>onto the group every so often to
> > >>lambaste me.
> >
> > > Everyone knows what he was up to.
> >
> > Doug is correct. I obviously didn't "condemn" the magazine. I think it
> > was good work actually.
>
> How would you know? You never bought a single issue.

LOL! I should have known it.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

DTotheroh wrote:

>>Doug is correct. I obviously didn't
>>"condemn" the magazine. I think it was
>>good work actually.

>How would you know? You never bought
>a single issue.

People whose judgment I respect
told me it was good.

What's yer beef, Totheroh? I didn't
dredge up Bonnie McCourt's post,
Carnahan did.

I had forgotten how crazed it was.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

In article <9o4ea290jnq497q38vnkakjfb4b6ou7npm RemoveThis @4ax.com>, Phil P wrote:

> On 1 Jul 2006 16:50:44 -0700, "David B. Pearson" <pearson RemoveThis @silent-movies.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >I very much miss the LIMELIGHT newsletter/magazine.
>
> As do I. And people who don't know what an enormous effort went into
> publishing
> it shouldn't be so quick to condemn.

By "people who don't know," I presume you mean George, who did not in
any way "condemn" the publication. All he did is ask what's going on
with it - a question which could easily have been answered by David.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

Doug Sulpy wrote:
> In article <1151870845.651023.95390.TakeThisOut@j8g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> Richard Carnahan <rfcsac627n.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > David Totheroh wrote:
>
> > > How would you know? You never bought a single issue.
> >
> > LOL! I should have known it.
>
> Does the fact the George didn't subscribe to "Limelight" bar him from
> asking about its current status? Or, perhaps in your rule book, he's
> not even allowed to mention it.

Since when was this about LIMELIGHT subscriptions?

>
> So, David, what's the current status of "Limelight"?

Probably better than George's first marriage.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

In article <1151870845.651023.95390 DeleteThis @j8g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Richard Carnahan <rfcsac627n DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote:

> David Totheroh wrote:

> > How would you know? You never bought a single issue.
>
> LOL! I should have known it.

Does the fact the George didn't subscribe to "Limelight" bar him from
asking about its current status? Or, perhaps in your rule book, he's
not even allowed to mention it.

So, David, what's the current status of "Limelight"?
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

rfcsac627n.TakeThisOut@aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
wrote:

>Doug Sulpy wrote:


>>So, David, what's the current status of
>>"Limelight"?

>    Probably better than George's first
>marriage.

I guess that's supposed to upset me, eh?

Well, Dickie, you're the one who
reprinted Bonnie McCourt's post
that reveals her as a major loon.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

George Shelps wrote:
> rfcsac627n RemoveThis @aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
> wrote:
>
> >Doug Sulpy wrote:
>
>
> >>So, David, what's the current status of
> >>"Limelight"?
>
> > Probably better than George's first
> >marriage.
>
> I guess that's supposed to upset me, eh?

Does it? You've been attacking others through surrogates for years.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

rfcsac627n.RemoveThis@aol.com (Richard Carnahan) wrote:


>>>Doug Sulpy wrote:

>>>>So, David, what's the current status
>>>>of"Limelight"?

>>>        Probably better than George's
>>>first marriage.

>>I guess that's supposed to upset me, eh?

>    Does it?

Nope.

>You've been attacking others
>through surrogates for years.

Totheroh committed
slander against me on 2 occasions,
recently calling me a draft dodger.

As I have pointed out many times,
I was targeted by DT and others
for my dissent about Chaplin's
Cold War troubles and they have
resorted to the most scurrilous personal
attacks.

I have never gone on the offensive
without provocation.

I came here with a positive feeling about Chaplin, thinking that his
1972 return to America had ended the "era of bad feelings."

But no! Here was a fever swamp
of cranky leftism and Cold War
revisionism. When I challenged it,
personal attacks followed.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine? 

Doug Sulpy wrote:
> In article <1151938320.108589.277110 DeleteThis @j8g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> Richard Carnahan <rfcsac627n DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote:
>
> > George Shelps wrote:
> > > rfcsac627n DeleteThis @aol.com (Richard Carnahan)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >Doug Sulpy wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >>So, David, what's the current status of
> > > >>"Limelight"?
> > >
> > > > Probably better than George's first
> > > >marriage.
> > >
> > > I guess that's supposed to upset me, eh?
> >
> > Does it? You've been attacking others through surrogates for years.
>
> Whatever that means.
> But, you know, I'm wondering...
>
> What's the current status of "Limelight"?

Why now? You never bought an issue either.
 >> Stay informed about: Whatever happened to "Limelight" magazine?