How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due?

On Sep 28, 11:55 pm, trotsky <gmsi... DeleteThis @email.com> wrote:
> Well that's great, Calvin--you can sit there and be content in your
> racist position. I will continue to bust you on it every single time.

I have no racist position.

What's wrong with you though? Of the people that I've
been regularly communicating with in these newsgroups
you're the only one who sets out to try to ruin someone's
reputation. Have you been a bully all your life? You're
like villians in mob movies. Who do you think observes
your behavior and admires you for it?
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

On Sep 29, 12:23 am, Calvin <cri....RemoveThis@windstream.net> wrote:
> On Sep 28, 11:55 pm, trotsky <gmsi....RemoveThis@email.com> wrote:
>
> > Well that's great, Calvin--you can sit there and be content in your
> > racist position. I will continue to bust you on it every single time.
>
> I have no racist position.
>
> What's wrong with you though? Of the people that I've
> been regularly communicating with in these newsgroups
> you're the only one who sets out to try to ruin someone's
> reputation. Have you been a bully all your life? You're
> like villians in mob movies. Who do you think observes
> your behavior and admires you for it?

He's a typical leftwinger. Behaves with the vindictiveness of a
scorned woman. Is completely intolerant of divergent opinions. Is SO
terrified of his own image in people's eyes that he unintentionally
destroys it by defending it at every turn. The kind of person who
uses the word, "I" every other word.
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

Calvin wrote:
> On Sep 28, 11:55 pm, trotsky <gmsi....DeleteThis@email.com> wrote:
>> Well that's great, Calvin--you can sit there and be content in your
>> racist position. I will continue to bust you on it every single time.
>
> I have no racist position.


See my previous exposition on the subject.


> What's wrong with you though? Of the people that I've
> been regularly communicating with in these newsgroups
> you're the only one who sets out to try to ruin someone's
> reputation.


A) I don't know what you mean by "reputation" on Usenet, and B) what I
do is wait for your true colors to come out and then give my opinion in
no uncertain terms.


Have you been a bully all your life? You're
> like villians in mob movies. Who do you think observes
> your behavior and admires you for it?


Calvin, I find your neo-con, one-step-removed-from-the-KKK (is that
enough hyphens for you, Derek?) highly offensive. The worst thing that
you can say about me is that these discussions aren't above movies, but
in a way they are because invariably guys like you and Rich starts
whining about "leftists" regardless of what the topic is, so, when that
stuff starts seeping in like a cancer I'm only too happy to dispense
with the culprits. The only thing you're complaining about is me being
good at what I set out to do.
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

On Sep 29, 3:13 pm, trotsky <gmsi....DeleteThis@email.com> wrote:
> RichA wrote:
> > (trotsky) Is completely intolerant of divergent opinions. Is SO
> > terrified of his own image in people's eyes that he unintentionally
> > destroys it by defending it at every turn. The kind of person who
> > uses the word, "I" every other word.

> That's not even close to accurate, and your comma abuse shows just how
> pig-ignorant you are.

Yeah, a comma typo. I think we know who is the pig-ignorant
one.

That's it, gotta go, there's a game to watch. If it soothes
your ego, you win. You're right and I'm wrong. Victory
flowers are on the way.
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

RichA wrote:
> On Sep 29, 12:23 am, Calvin <cri....RemoveThis@windstream.net> wrote:
>> On Sep 28, 11:55 pm, trotsky <gmsi....RemoveThis@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Well that's great, Calvin--you can sit there and be content in your
>>> racist position. I will continue to bust you on it every single time.
>> I have no racist position.
>>
>> What's wrong with you though? Of the people that I've
>> been regularly communicating with in these newsgroups
>> you're the only one who sets out to try to ruin someone's
>> reputation. Have you been a bully all your life? You're
>> like villians in mob movies. Who do you think observes
>> your behavior and admires you for it?
>
> He's a typical leftwinger. Behaves with the vindictiveness of a
> scorned woman.


More misogyny. You're making Calvin look worse here, Rich.


Is completely intolerant of divergent opinions. Is SO
> terrified of his own image in people's eyes that he unintentionally
> destroys it by defending it at every turn. The kind of person who
> uses the word, "I" every other word.


That's not even close to accurate, and your comma abuse shows just how
pig-ignorant you are.
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

On Sep 28, 1:55 pm, Calvin <cri... RemoveThis @windstream.net> wrote:
>
> But I wonder if you would have refrained from using his
> southernness as an insult. We all have out little bugbears.

Well, I live in Australia, so you'll all Northerners to me.
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

On Sep 26, 8:40 am, trotsky <gmsi... DeleteThis @email.com> wrote:
> Calvin wrote:
> > On Sep 24, 8:18 pm, RichA <rander3... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Between now and next Nov?
>
> > Well, there's TRIUMPH DES WILLIE'S (bitch wife):
> > "Hillary is America! America is Hillary!"
>
> Gay guys usually feel threatened by women.

No one mentioned a woman?
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

On Sep 29, 3:13 pm, trotsky <gmsi... RemoveThis @email.com> wrote:
> RichA wrote:
> > On Sep 29, 12:23 am, Calvin <cri... RemoveThis @windstream.net> wrote:
> >> On Sep 28, 11:55 pm, trotsky <gmsi... RemoveThis @email.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Well that's great, Calvin--you can sit there and be content in your
> >>> racist position. I will continue to bust you on it every single time.
> >> I have no racist position.
>
> >> What's wrong with you though? Of the people that I've
> >> been regularly communicating with in these newsgroups
> >> you're the only one who sets out to try to ruin someone's
> >> reputation. Have you been a bully all your life? You're
> >> like villians in mob movies. Who do you think observes
> >> your behavior and admires you for it?
>
> > He's a typical leftwinger. Behaves with the vindictiveness of a
> > scorned woman.
>
> More misogyny. You're making Calvin look worse here, Rich.
>
> Is completely intolerant of divergent opinions. Is SO
>
> > terrified of his own image in people's eyes that he unintentionally
> > destroys it by defending it at every turn. The kind of person who
> > uses the word, "I" every other word.
>
> That's not even close to accurate, and your comma abuse shows just how
> pig-ignorant you are.

Grammatical corrections. The last refuge of the internet scoundrel?
Admit it Trotsky, your life is directed by your fear of your own image
in other's eyes.
Your attempted character assassination of others is just one facet of
your low-life personna.
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

On Oct 1, 5:03 pm, trotsky <gmsi... DeleteThis @email.com> wrote:
> RichA wrote:
> > Grammatical corrections.
>
> Oh, right, and this isn't in keeping with Calvin's whining over
> semantics: "I'm not a racist, I'm a nationalistic bigot!"

Not quite accurate, but I'm glad you resumed your medication
over the weekend. Your manic behavior all last week was
becoming annoying.
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

"Calvin" <crice5 RemoveThis @windstream.net> wrote in message
news:1190947806.032860.222300@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...

> As for being there in the first place, it was the right thing to
> do, based on Iraq's refusal to cooperate with the U.N., and
> on what the whole world thought was the danger posed by
> Iraq. It is only hindsight, primarily failure to find WMDs,
> that would have made me think otherwise if I had had a
> future-revealing crystal ball at the time of the invasion.


http://harpers.org/archive/2007/09/hbc-90001301
September 26, 2007

It's not as dramatic as the Downing Street Memo but El Pais, the Madrid
daily, has obtained a revealing transcript of a pre-Iraq War meeting between
President Bush and Spain's then-prime minister Jose Maria Aznar. Below is
the lead to the story, which ran in El Pais today.

Four weeks before the invasion of Iraq, George W. Bush made a public demand
to Saddam Hussein in the following terms: disarmament or war. Behind closed
doors, Bush acknowledged that the war was inevitable. During a long private
conversation with [Aznar], which took place on Saturday, February 22, 2003,
Bush made clear that the time had come to take out Saddam: "There are two
weeks left. In two weeks we'll be militarily ready. We'll be in Baghdad by
the end of March."
Excerpts:

Bush to American Allies: support war or starve

[Condoleezza Rice has just described the diplomatic situation to Bush and
Aznar, explaining that Iraq is continuing to insist that it has no weapons
of mass destruction.]

Bush: This is like Chinese water torture. We have to put an end to it.

Aznar: I agree, but it would be best to have as much support as possible.
Have a little patience.

Bush: My patience has ended. I'm not thinking of waiting beyond mid-March.

Aznar: I'm not asking that you have endless patience. Simply that
everything is done to [have maximum international support].

Bush: Countries like Mexico, Chile, Angola, and Cameroon should know that
what's at stake is the security of the United States . . . [Chilean
President Ricardo] Lagos should know that the Free Trade Accord with Chile
is awaiting Senate confirmation and a negative attitude about this could put
ratification in danger. Angola is receiving Millennium Account funds [to
help alleviate poverty] and that could be jeopardized also if he's not
supportive.

Aznar: Tony [Blair] wants to wait until March 14.

Bush: I prefer the 10th. This is like a good cop, bad cop routine. I don't
care if I'm the bad cop and he's the good cop.




Bush on Iraq: the future is bright

"We're developing a very strong package of humanitarian aid. We can win
[the war] without much destruction. We're planning for a post-Saddam Iraq
and believe there is a strong base to build a better future. Iraq has a good
bureaucracy and relatively string civil society."
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:32:40 -0500, Tom Zielinski wrote:

>
> http://harpers.org/archive/2007/09/hbc-90001301
> September 26, 2007
>
> It's not as dramatic as the Downing Street Memo but El Pais, the Madrid
> daily, has obtained a revealing transcript of a pre-Iraq War meeting between
> President Bush and Spain's then-prime minister Jose Maria Aznar. Below is
> the lead to the story, which ran in El Pais today.
>
> Four weeks before the invasion of Iraq, George W. Bush made a public demand
> to Saddam Hussein in the following terms: disarmament or war. Behind closed
> doors, Bush acknowledged that the war was inevitable. During a long private
> conversation with [Aznar], which took place on Saturday, February 22, 2003,
> Bush made clear that the time had come to take out Saddam: "There are two
> weeks left. In two weeks we'll be militarily ready. We'll be in Baghdad by
> the end of March."

"revealing"? Revealing of what? That GWB wasn't so stupid as to make a
threat he couldn't back up? That he was able to call Hussein's response
ahead of time? That he didn't play hardball with one of the worst enemies
America had? That he didn't make his position clear to reluctant allies?

Sounds like GWB ws on the ball and in control at a critical point in
time-- Doing his job and doing it well. Not to say that mistakes weren't
made, but you try running a war without making mistakes. We won WWII with
*many* worse mistakes than GWB has ever made.

rcp
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

On Oct 2, 11:46 am, Derek Janssen <ejan... DeleteThis @nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
> George Peatty wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:57:55 -0500, rcp <r... DeleteThis @dont.spam.me> wrote:
> >>Sounds like GWB ws on the ball and in control at a critical point in
> >>time-- Doing his job and doing it well. Not to say that mistakes weren't
> >>made, but you try running a war without making mistakes. We won WWII with
> >>*many* worse mistakes than GWB has ever made.
>
> > Want proof of that? Watch PBS on Sunday nights ..
>
> ...The History Channel could show Ken Burns! :-P
>
> Derek Janssen (sorry, just marveling at the rare spectacle of a goofy
> show-conservative telling us to watch PBS)
> eja... DeleteThis @comcast.net

Here's another spectacle: Watch the interview with Clarence
Thomas on the CBS News website.

http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/60minutes/main3415.shtml
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due? 

On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:57:55 -0500, rcp <rcp RemoveThis @dont.spam.me> wrote:

>Sounds like GWB ws on the ball and in control at a critical point in
>time-- Doing his job and doing it well. Not to say that mistakes weren't
>made, but you try running a war without making mistakes. We won WWII with
>*many* worse mistakes than GWB has ever made.

Want proof of that? Watch PBS on Sunday nights ..
 >> Stay informed about: How many more pro-Democrat propaganda movies are due?