This week's leftwing traitor movie...

moviePig wrote:
> On Oct 20, 10:08 am, trotsky <gmsi... DeleteThis @email.com> wrote:
>> moviePig wrote:
>>> On Oct 20, 9:02 am, trotsky <gmsi... DeleteThis @email.com> wrote:
>>>> nick wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 19, 8:43?pm, Calvin <cri... DeleteThis @windstream.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 19, 7:40 pm, RichA <rander3... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> ... Getting past the pap, you'll come to the conclusion (if you
>>>>>>> have any brains) that in the case of someone who might crash airplanes
>>>>>>> into sky scrapers, torturing some likely guilty Arab is a no-brainer.
>>>>>> It will be interesting to see how the Hillary Administration
>>>>>> goes about protecting America. Maybe she will offer
>>>>>> suspected terrorists milk and cookies (that she baked
>>>>>> herself) until they reveal their plans.
>>>>> Softening up terrorists with milk and cookies will do a hell of a lot
>>>>> better getting terrorists to reveal their plans then all that lame-ass
>>>>> Bush torture stuff. Didn't you see that WWII propaganda movie on TCM
>>>>> about how the Nazis got our boys to talk by giving them whiskey and
>>>>> letting them play pool?
>>>> Nick, you son of a bitch, that was as bad as the Bataan Death March!
>>>> Who ever heard of killing someone with a bataan anyway.
>>> http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0328945/
>> Are you saying one of the cheerleaders was Japanese?
>
> Are my puns really that bad? (That's rhetorical.) You said you'd
> never heard of killing someone with a bataan...


Right, and we know the Bataan Death March was an example of Japanese
atrocities, so the logical conclusion is if there was a cheerleader
massacre a Japanese cheerleader would've had to have been the perp.

Hell, let Calvin sort the whole thing out, it's his whining point.
 >> Stay informed about: This week's leftwing traitor movie... 

RichA wrote:
> On Oct 19, 8:43 pm, Calvin <cri... DeleteThis @windstream.net> wrote:
>> On Oct 19, 7:40 pm, RichA <rander3... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ... Getting past the pap, you'll come to the conclusion (if you
>>> have any brains) that in the case of someone who might crash airplanes
>>> into sky scrapers, torturing some likely guilty Arab is a no-brainer.
>> It will be interesting to see how the Hillary Administration
>> goes about protecting America. Maybe she will offer
>> suspected terrorists milk and cookies (that she baked
>> herself) until they reveal their plans.
>
> Same way her husband did. By ignoring and even letting the threats
> get away.


I'm beginnning to see how this works: hostages taken on Carter's watch,
Reagan is the hero. The U.S. is attacked on Chimpy's watch, Clinton's
to blame. Rich, are you trying to make the GOP mentality into something
that is just about whining and never has the right answer? Kudos!
 >> Stay informed about: This week's leftwing traitor movie... 

Thanks Achan_Back, very well stated and summarized.


> Let me get this straight.
> You STILL support Bush?!?
>
> With all the benefit of hindsight
> you still support Bush?!?
>
> You give new meaning to hindsight.
>
> Your "no-brainer" is just that.
>
> You accuse others: "don't like the idea of fighting
> for ANYTHING", but YOU are in favor of
> fighting for NOTHING. And things worth
> fighting for you aren't satisfied until they *are*
> NOTHING (destroying the Constitution in order
> to save it; toss our morality in order to protect
> our culture; bankrupt the country paying for a
> war to grab oil wealth for the few; turn heroes
> into phoney props - Jessica Lynch, Pat Tillman;
> the central pillar to democracy is the Law, but
> ... how many pages just to scratch the surface of
> the Bush lawlessness?...; the democratic process
> itself has been raped by the Bushites; making
> our country LESS safe by an ill-conceived war;
> supporting the troops by launching them into a
> phoney mission;).
>
> Yes indeed, your hindsight is a no-brainer.
>
 >> Stay informed about: This week's leftwing traitor movie... 

On Oct 19, 7:40 pm, RichA <rander3....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...is "Rendition" where Reese Witherspoon gets to play the wife of an
> Arab who is taken off to one of those countries where they torture
> people to obtain information, under the watch of "confused" CIA agent
> Jake Gyllenhaal. Tom Cruise gets to play a maniacal "Bush
> administration" hawk...oh wait! That's in ANOTHER leftwing traitor
> movie! The presence of Meryl Streep in both kind of threw me. Also,
> why would Witherspoon MARRY and Arab anyway? Does she like dressing
> head to toe in black with slits in the sheet for eyes?
>
> Drooling, hand-wringing liberalism at its worst, navel-gazing, second-
> guessing armchair warriors who don't like the idea of fighting for
> ANYTHING. Getting past the pap, you'll come to the conclusion (if you
> have any brains) that in the case of someone who might crash airplanes
> into sky scrapers, torturing some likely guilty Arab is a no-brainer.

why do you hate america so much Reich?
 >> Stay informed about: This week's leftwing traitor movie... 

In article <1192898894.233755.314480.TakeThisOut@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
rander3127.TakeThisOut@gmail.com says...
> On Oct 19, 8:43 pm, Calvin <cri....TakeThisOut@windstream.net> wrote:
> > On Oct 19, 7:40 pm, RichA <rander3....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > ... Getting past the pap, you'll come to the conclusion (if you
> > > have any brains) that in the case of someone who might crash airplanes
> > > into sky scrapers, torturing some likely guilty Arab is a no-brainer.
> >
> > It will be interesting to see how the Hillary Administration
> > goes about protecting America. Maybe she will offer
> > suspected terrorists milk and cookies (that she baked
> > herself) until they reveal their plans.
>
> Same way her husband did. By ignoring and even letting the threats
> get away.

::blink blink::

Oh, the irony, the utter irony.

(Better than Bush's "technique" of not just ignoring and letting threats
get away, but CREATING NEW ONES EVERY SINGLE DAY...)
 >> Stay informed about: This week's leftwing traitor movie...